Blanc D S, Lugeon C, Wenger A, Siegrist H H, Francioli P
Division Autonome de Médecine Préventive Hospitalière, Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne.
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Oct;32(10):2505-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.32.10.2505-2509.1994.
Antibiogram typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with selected antibiotics was evaluated as a primary epidemiological typing tool and compared with ribotyping. Antibiograms were derived with the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method by using erythromycin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. For typing, antibiogram data were analyzed by similarity analysis of disk zone diameters (quantitative antibiogram typing). One hundred seventy-two isolates were typed. Reproducibility reached 98% for the quantitative antibiogram and 100% for ribotyping. With three selected restriction enzymes (EcoRV, HindIII, and KpnI), 40 epidemiologically unrelated isolates could be classified into 21 ribotypes, whereas quantitative antibiogram typing classified these isolates into 19 groups. To evaluate the discriminatory power of the methods, we calculated an index of discrimination from data obtained with these 40 isolates. This index takes into consideration both the number of types defined by the typing method and their relative frequencies. With both ribotyping and quantitative antibiogram typing, high discrimination indices (0.972 and 0.954, respectively) were obtained. When epidemiological links between patients (ward, period of hospitalization, and contacts between staff and patients) were compared with the results of ribotyping or the quantitative antibiogram typing method, it appeared that both methods were able to discriminate epidemiological clusters, with only a few discrepancies. In conclusion, quantitative antibiogram typing, although not necessarily based on genomic markers, is a simple method which enables a reliable workup of methicillin-resistant S. aureus epidemic when sophisticated molecular typing methods are not available.
对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌进行选定抗生素的药敏谱分型,作为一种主要的流行病学分型工具进行评估,并与核糖体分型进行比较。采用红霉素、克林霉素、复方新诺明、庆大霉素和环丙沙星,通过 Kirby-Bauer 纸片扩散法获得药敏谱。为了进行分型,通过对纸片抑菌圈直径进行相似性分析(定量药敏谱分型)来分析药敏谱数据。对172株分离株进行了分型。定量药敏谱分型的重复性达到98%,核糖体分型的重复性达到100%。使用三种选定的限制性内切酶(EcoRV、HindIII 和 KpnI),40株流行病学上不相关的分离株可分为21种核糖体分型,而定量药敏谱分型将这些分离株分为19组。为了评估这些方法的鉴别能力,我们根据这40株分离株获得的数据计算了鉴别指数。该指数同时考虑了分型方法定义的类型数量及其相对频率。核糖体分型和定量药敏谱分型均获得了较高的鉴别指数(分别为0.972和0.954)。当将患者之间的流行病学联系(病房、住院时间以及医护人员与患者之间的接触情况)与核糖体分型或定量药敏谱分型方法的结果进行比较时,发现这两种方法都能够区分流行病学聚类,仅有少数差异。总之,定量药敏谱分型虽然不一定基于基因组标记,但在没有复杂的分子分型方法时,是一种能够对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌流行情况进行可靠分析的简单方法。