• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小的单侧肾细胞癌的治疗:根治性手术与保留肾单位手术对比

Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery.

作者信息

Butler B P, Novick A C, Miller D P, Campbell S A, Licht M R

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 1995 Jan;45(1):34-40; discussion 40-1. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(95)96306-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(95)96306-5
PMID:7817478
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There is controversy concerning the management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the relative efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery in such patients.

METHODS

Patients with a single, small (less than 4 cm), localized, unilateral, sporadic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were identified from an institutional registry. From 1975 to 1992, 88 patients fulfilling these criteria were treated with either radical nephrectomy (n = 42) or nephron-sparing surgery (n = 46). The mean postoperative follow-up interval is 48 +/- 29 months.

RESULTS

The radical and nephron-sparing surgical groups were well matched for patient age, sex, renal function, diabetes, hypertension, tumor size, tumor location, and tumor stage. All patients in both groups had low pathologic stage RCC. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of the mean hospital stay, the requirement for blood transfusions, or the occurrence of surgical complications. There was no difference in the mean preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels for patients in the nephron-sparing surgery group. However, the mean postoperative serum creatinine levels were significantly higher than the mean preoperative levels for patients in the radical nephrectomy group (P < 0.001). A single patient in each group developed recurrent RCC postoperatively. The cancer-specific 5-year survival rate for patients in the radical and nephron-sparing surgical groups is 97% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical nephrectomy and nephron-sparing surgery each provide safe and effective curative treatment for patients with a single, small, unilateral localized RCC. The long-term renal functional advantage of nephron-sparing surgery in this setting is not established.

摘要

目的

对于小的单侧肾细胞癌的治疗存在争议。本研究旨在评估根治性肾切除术与保留肾单位手术对此类患者的相对疗效。

方法

从机构登记处识别出患有单个、小(小于4厘米)、局限性、单侧、散发性肾细胞癌(RCC)的患者。1975年至1992年,88例符合这些标准的患者接受了根治性肾切除术(n = 42)或保留肾单位手术(n = 46)。术后平均随访间隔为48±29个月。

结果

根治性手术组和保留肾单位手术组在患者年龄、性别、肾功能、糖尿病、高血压、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置和肿瘤分期方面匹配良好。两组所有患者的病理分期均为低分期RCC。两组在平均住院时间、输血需求或手术并发症发生率方面无差异。保留肾单位手术组患者术前和术后血清肌酐水平均值无差异。然而,根治性肾切除术组患者术后血清肌酐水平均值显著高于术前水平(P < 0.001)。每组各有1例患者术后出现复发性RCC。根治性手术组和保留肾单位手术组患者的癌症特异性5年生存率分别为97%和100%。

结论

根治性肾切除术和保留肾单位手术均为单个、小、单侧局限性RCC患者提供了安全有效的治愈性治疗。在这种情况下,保留肾单位手术的长期肾功能优势尚未确立。

相似文献

1
Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery.小的单侧肾细胞癌的治疗:根治性手术与保留肾单位手术对比
Urology. 1995 Jan;45(1):34-40; discussion 40-1. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(95)96306-5.
2
Outcome of laparoscopic radical and open partial nephrectomy for the sporadic 4 cm. or less renal tumor with a normal contralateral kidney.腹腔镜根治性肾切除术与开放性部分肾切除术治疗对侧肾脏正常的散发性4厘米及以下肾肿瘤的疗效
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1356-9; discussion 1359-60. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64448-5.
3
Management of small solitary unilateral renal cell carcinomas: impact of central versus peripheral tumor location.小的孤立性单侧肾细胞癌的管理:肿瘤位于中央与外周的影响
J Urol. 1998 Apr;159(4):1156-60.
4
Disease outcome in patients with low stage renal cell carcinoma treated with nephron sparing or radical surgery.接受保留肾单位手术或根治性手术治疗的低分期肾细胞癌患者的疾病转归。
J Urol. 1996 Jun;155(6):1868-73.
5
Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney.对孤立肾肾细胞癌行保留肾单位手术。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2007;41(1):10-3. doi: 10.1080/00365590600911225.
6
Elective Nephron Sparing Surgery Decreases Other Cause Mortality Relative to Radical Nephrectomy Only in Specific Subgroups of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma.择期保留肾单位手术与根治性肾切除术相比仅降低特定肾细胞癌患者亚组的其他原因死亡率。
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.093. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Efficacy of nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: analysis based on the new 1997 tumor-node-metastasis staging system.保留肾单位手术治疗肾细胞癌的疗效:基于1997年新的肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统的分析。
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2868-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.9.2868.
8
Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney.单侧肾细胞癌且对侧肾脏正常患者行根治性肾切除术与保留肾单位手术的配对比较。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Dec;75(12):1236-42. doi: 10.4065/75.12.1236.
9
Kidney autotransplantation after nephrectomy and work bench surgery as an ultimate approach to nephron-sparing surgery.肾切除术后肾自体移植和工作檯手术作为保肾手术的终极方法。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Feb 20;16(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1338-1.
10
Renal cell carcinoma in the solitary kidney: an analysis of complications and outcome after nephron sparing surgery.孤立肾肾细胞癌:保留肾单位手术后并发症及预后分析
J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):454-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64657-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative Super-Selective Embolization versus "On-Clamp" Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for T1 Renal Tumors- A Prospective Randomized Study.术前超选择性栓塞术与“夹闭法”腹腔镜下T1期肾肿瘤部分肾切除术的前瞻性随机研究
J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2024 May 21;11(2):18-26. doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.v11i2.328. eCollection 2024.
2
Nephron sparing surgery outcomes in Wilms' tumor: is it ready for primetime?保留肾单位手术治疗肾母细胞瘤的疗效:是否已经准备好进入黄金时代?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Nov 28;39(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05299-5.
3
Impact of Positive Surgical Margins After Partial Nephrectomy.
肾部分切除术后切缘阳性的影响。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2020 Oct 2;21:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.08.006. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Impact of Previous Nephrectomy on Clinical Outcome of Metastatic Renal Carcinoma Treated With Immune-Oncology: A Real-World Study on Behalf of Meet-URO Group (MeetUro-7b).既往肾切除术对接受免疫肿瘤治疗的转移性肾癌临床结局的影响:代表Meet-URO组(MeetUro-7b)开展的一项真实世界研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 8;11:682449. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.682449. eCollection 2021.
5
A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer.对肾癌生物学、评估及治疗的认识在25年中的演变与进展
Urol Oncol. 2021 Sep;39(9):548-560. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.038. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
6
Personalized Treatment for Small Renal Tumors: Decision Analysis of Competing Causes of Mortality.个性化治疗小肾肿瘤:死亡竞争原因的决策分析。
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):732-743. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181114. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
7
Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.实性肾肿块的影像学检查
Urol Clin North Am. 2018 Aug;45(3):311-330. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
8
[Standard surgery for small renal masses (<4 cm)].[小肾肿块(<4厘米)的标准手术]
Urologe A. 2018 Mar;57(3):280-284. doi: 10.1007/s00120-018-0583-9.
9
Incident CKD after Radical or Partial Nephrectomy.根治性或部分肾切除术术后急性肾损伤。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jan;29(1):207-216. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017020136. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy for clinical localised renal masses.临床局限性肾肿块的部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 9;5(5):CD012045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012045.pub2.