Suppr超能文献

床旁血红蛋白测量:对血清蛋白和电解质变化的敏感性

Bedside hemoglobin measurements: sensitivity to changes in serum protein and electrolytes.

作者信息

McNulty S E, Sharkey S J, Schieren H

机构信息

Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5092.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1994 Nov;10(6):377-81. doi: 10.1007/BF01618418.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to compare the effect of protein and electrolyte changes associated with hemodilution on the accuracy of photometric and conductivity hemoglobin determination methods.

METHODS

Blood samples from 10 patients with normal preoperative serum electrolytes and total protein levels were studied. From an indwelling arterial line, 20 ml of blood were removed; hemoglobin values were measured pre-(Baseline) and postdilution by Coulter counter, conductivity, and photometric methods. Blood samples were diluted by placing 4 ml of blood into three test tubes, and adding 1 ml of either 25% albumin, 0.9% sodium chloride, or 5% dextrose in water.

RESULTS

Blood sample dilution resulted in a reported conductivity hemoglobin that was significantly different from the Coulter value (p = 0.0004) when 25% albumin, 0.9% sodium chloride, and 5% dextrose in water solution was used. Using the same dilutions, the photometric method accurately reflected Coulter hemoglobin values. The correlation between photometric and Coulter hemoglobin measurements was R2 = 0.97, p = 0.0001. Correcting the conductivity hemoglobin values for changes in total protein, chloride and sodium significantly improved correlation with Coulter hemoglobin (R2 of uncorrected versus corrected = 0.37 and 0.72; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the range of electrolyte and protein concentrations found in this study, the photometric method of hemoglobin assessment was more accurate than either corrected or uncorrected conductivity hemoglobin determinations, as compared to Coulter-based measurements.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是比较血液稀释相关的蛋白质和电解质变化对光度法和电导率法测定血红蛋白准确性的影响。

方法

研究了10例术前血清电解质和总蛋白水平正常的患者的血样。从留置动脉导管中抽取20ml血液;用库尔特计数器、电导率法和光度法在稀释前(基线)和稀释后测量血红蛋白值。将4ml血液放入三个试管中进行稀释,并分别加入1ml 25%白蛋白、0.9%氯化钠或5%葡萄糖水溶液。

结果

当使用25%白蛋白、0.9%氯化钠和5%葡萄糖水溶液时,血样稀释导致报告的电导率血红蛋白值与库尔特值有显著差异(p = 0.0004)。使用相同的稀释液,光度法准确反映了库尔特血红蛋白值。光度法和库尔特血红蛋白测量值之间的相关性为R2 = 0.97,p = 0.0001。对总蛋白、氯和钠的变化校正电导率血红蛋白值后,与库尔特血红蛋白的相关性显著提高(未校正与校正后的R2分别为0.37和0.72;p = 0.0001)。

结论

在本研究发现的电解质和蛋白质浓度范围内,与基于库尔特的测量相比,血红蛋白评估的光度法比校正或未校正的电导率血红蛋白测定更准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验