• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验呈阳性的受试者中,对吸入生理盐水缺乏显著的支气管反应性。

Lack of significant bronchial reactivity to inhaled normal saline in subjects with a positive methacholine challenge test.

作者信息

Basir R, Lehrman S G, De Lorenzo L J, Kalenderian R, Maguire G P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.

出版信息

J Asthma. 1995;32(1):63-7. doi: 10.3109/02770909509089501.

DOI:10.3109/02770909509089501
PMID:7844091
Abstract

Patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma often have normal resting pulmonary function. In these patients, a determination of airway responsiveness by bronchial challenge is useful in demonstrating bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR), a defining feature of asthma. In the methacholine (Mch) challenge, it is recommended that following a baseline measurement of FEV1, the patient inhale the normal saline (NS) diluent and FEV1 be repeated to assess for nonspecific BHR to NS. It is also recommended that post-NS inhalation FEV1 should be used as the control value from which decrement in FEV1 is compared following Mch challenge. Mch testing was performed in 44 patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma (cough, chest tightness, dyspnea) and normal resting pulmonary function. Baseline spirometry was obtained and repeated after inhalation of NS and after five breaths each of Mch at the following concentrations: 0.025 mg/ml, 0.25 mg/ml, 2.5 mg/ml, 10 mg/ml, and 25 mg/ml. The procedure was terminated when FEV1 decreased to at least 80% of the post-NS value or if the maximal concentration of Mch had been reached. The post-NS FEV1 value was > or = 91% of the pre-NS value in all the subjects range 91-105%). Using the post-NS FEV1 as the recommended control value, 20 patients (45%) had a positive Mch challenge and 24 patients (55%) had a negative Mch challenge. Had we used the pre-NS FEV1 as a control value, only 2 patients would have been reclassified, and when these 2 cases are carefully examined, there would have been no significant change in the clinical interpretation of the MCh test.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

有哮喘症状的患者通常静息肺功能正常。对于这些患者,通过支气管激发试验测定气道反应性有助于证明支气管高反应性(BHR),这是哮喘的一个关键特征。在乙酰甲胆碱(Mch)激发试验中,建议在测定FEV1基线值后,患者吸入生理盐水(NS)稀释液,然后重复测定FEV1,以评估对NS的非特异性BHR。还建议将吸入NS后的FEV1用作对照值,据此比较Mch激发试验后FEV1的下降情况。对44例有哮喘症状(咳嗽、胸闷、呼吸困难)且静息肺功能正常的患者进行了Mch试验。记录基线肺量计数据,并在吸入NS后以及分别吸入以下浓度的Mch各5次后重复记录:0.025mg/ml、0.25mg/ml、2.5mg/ml、10mg/ml和25mg/ml。当FEV1降至NS后值的至少80%或达到Mch最大浓度时,终止试验。所有受试者吸入NS后的FEV1值均≥吸入NS前值的91%(范围为91%-105%)。以吸入NS后的FEV1作为推荐对照值,20例患者(45%)Mch激发试验阳性,24例患者(55%)Mch激发试验阴性。如果我们以吸入NS前的FEV1作为对照值,只有2例患者的分类会改变,而仔细检查这2例病例后,Mch试验的临床解读不会有显著变化。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

1
Lack of significant bronchial reactivity to inhaled normal saline in subjects with a positive methacholine challenge test.在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验呈阳性的受试者中,对吸入生理盐水缺乏显著的支气管反应性。
J Asthma. 1995;32(1):63-7. doi: 10.3109/02770909509089501.
2
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of methacholine challenge tests assessing airway hyperreactivity in asthmatic patients - a multifunctional approach.评估哮喘患者气道高反应性的乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的诊断准确性——一种多功能方法。
Respir Res. 2016 Nov 17;17(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0470-0.
4
The measurement of cough response to bronchoconstriction induced by methacholine inhalation in healthy subjects: An examination using the Astograph method.健康受试者吸入乙酰甲胆碱诱导支气管收缩时咳嗽反应的测量:使用阿斯托格拉夫法进行的一项检查。
Exp Lung Res. 2017 Aug-Sep;43(6-7):240-248. doi: 10.1080/01902148.2017.1342289. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
5
Effect of hyperoxia on bronchial response to inhaled methacholine.高氧对支气管对吸入乙酰甲胆碱反应的影响。
Allergy. 1991 Jan;46(1):35-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1991.tb00540.x.
6
[Comparison of sensitivity and specifity of two bronchial provocation tests with methacholine and hypertonic saline in bronchial hyperreactivity evaluation in asthmatics].[两种支气管激发试验(使用乙酰甲胆碱和高渗盐水)在哮喘患者支气管高反应性评估中的敏感性和特异性比较]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Feb;22(128):126-9.
7
The use of mouth occlusion pressure to evaluate the effect of an initial inhalation of nebulized saline in methacholine challenge.使用口腔闭合压评估雾化盐水初次吸入在乙酰甲胆碱激发试验中的效果。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1996 May-Jun;24(3):125-8.
8
Methacholine dry powder inhaler as a new tool for bronchial challenge test.乙酰甲胆碱干粉吸入器作为支气管激发试验的新工具。
Int J Pharm. 2008 Mar 20;352(1-2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.10.025. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
9
Assessment of airway hyperreactivity: comparison of forced spirometry and body plethysmography for methacholine challenge tests.气道高反应性评估:乙酰甲胆碱挑战试验中用力肺活量测定和体描法的比较。
Eur J Med Res. 2009 Dec 7;14 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):170-6. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-s4-170.
10
Time intervals (3' or 5') between dose steps can influence methacholine challenge test.剂量递增步骤之间的时间间隔(3分钟或5分钟)会影响乙酰甲胆碱激发试验。
Lung. 2005 Jan-Feb;183(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00408-004-2514-3.