Badiali D, Corazziari E, Habib F I, Tomei E, Bausano G, Magrini P, Anzini F, Torsoli A
Cattedra di Gastroenterologia I, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Feb;40(2):349-56. doi: 10.1007/BF02065421.
After a two-week basal period, 24 patients were randomly allocated to receive, with a crossover double-blind design, for two consecutive four-week periods, bran (20 g/24 hr) or placebo. The daily intake of water and dietary fibers was standardized. Symptomatology, oroanal transit time, bowel frequency, and stool weight were assessed in basal conditions and at week 4 and 8 of the treatment. Oroanal transit time decreased and bowel frequency and stool weight increased significantly during both bran and placebo administration in comparison with basal period. Bran treatment was more effective than placebo in improving bowel frequency and oroanal transit. During bran treatment oroanal transit time became normal only in patients with slow colonic transit and not in those with slow rectal transit. Neither the occurrence nor the severity of the most frequent accompanying symptoms of chronic constipation differed significantly between placebo and bran treatments.
在为期两周的基础期后,24名患者采用交叉双盲设计,被随机分配连续两个四周期接受麸皮(20克/24小时)或安慰剂治疗。水和膳食纤维的每日摄入量标准化。在基础状态以及治疗的第4周和第8周评估症状、口肛转运时间、排便频率和粪便重量。与基础期相比,在麸皮和安慰剂给药期间,口肛转运时间均缩短,排便频率和粪便重量均显著增加。麸皮治疗在改善排便频率和口肛转运方面比安慰剂更有效。在麸皮治疗期间,仅结肠转运缓慢的患者口肛转运时间恢复正常,而直肠转运缓慢的患者则未恢复正常。安慰剂和麸皮治疗之间,慢性便秘最常见伴随症状的发生率和严重程度均无显著差异。