Suppr超能文献

情感障碍中极性区分的长期稳定性。

Long-term stability of polarity distinctions in the affective disorders.

作者信息

Coryell W, Endicott J, Maser J D, Keller M B, Leon A C, Akiskal H S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Mar;152(3):385-90. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.3.385.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to quantify the long-term stability of distinctions between nonbipolar, bipolar II, and bipolar I affective disorders and to determine the predictors of shifts in patients' diagnoses among these categories.

METHOD

Probands entered the study as they sought treatment for manic, major depressive, or schizoaffective disorder diagnosed according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria. After thorough baseline evaluations, 605 patients with nonbipolar major depressive disorder or schizoaffective disorder, depressed type; 96 with bipolar II disorder; and 231 with bipolar I disorder or schizoaffective disorder, manic type, began the follow-up study. Direct interviews took place at 6-month intervals for the first 5 years and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

Only 20 (5.2%) of the 381 initially nonbipolar probands who completed 10 years of follow-up developed mania during that time, and only 19 (5.0%) developed hypomania. A slightly higher proportion of the 67 who began with bipolar II disorder developed mania during the 10 years. Although 101 (66.4%) of the 152 bipolar I or schizoaffective manic probands developed subsequent manic episodes, only 11 (7.2%) developed hypomanic episodes and no mania. Young age at intake and at onset and chronicity of the index episode predicted shifts from nonbipolar to bipolar II disorder. Psychosis and a family history of mania predicted shifts from nonbipolar to bipolar I disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

The high stability of baseline distinctions between nonbipolar, bipolar II, and bipolar I disorders, in combination with previously described family study data, strongly supports the separation of these disorders for both clinical and research purposes.

摘要

目的

本分析旨在量化非双相情感障碍、双相II型情感障碍和双相I型情感障碍之间区别的长期稳定性,并确定患者在这些类别中诊断转变的预测因素。

方法

先证者在寻求根据研究诊断标准诊断的躁狂症、重度抑郁症或分裂情感性障碍的治疗时进入研究。经过全面的基线评估后,605例非双相重度抑郁症或分裂情感性障碍(抑郁型)患者、96例双相II型情感障碍患者以及231例双相I型情感障碍或分裂情感性障碍(躁狂型)患者开始了随访研究。在最初的5年中,每6个月进行一次直接访谈,此后每年进行一次。

结果

在完成10年随访的381例最初为非双相情感障碍的先证者中,只有20例(5.2%)在那段时间出现躁狂发作,只有19例(5.0%)出现轻躁狂发作。最初为双相II型情感障碍的67例患者中,有略高比例的患者在10年内出现躁狂发作。虽然152例双相I型或分裂情感性躁狂先证者中有101例(66.4%)随后出现躁狂发作,但只有11例(7.2%)出现轻躁狂发作且无躁狂发作。入组时和发病时年龄较小以及首发发作的慢性病程可预测从非双相情感障碍向双相II型情感障碍的转变。精神病症状和躁狂家族史可预测从非双相情感障碍向双相I型情感障碍的转变。

结论

非双相情感障碍、双相II型情感障碍和双相I型情感障碍之间基线区别的高度稳定性,与先前描述的家族研究数据相结合,有力地支持了出于临床和研究目的对这些障碍进行区分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验