Suppr超能文献

神经影像学情绪反应抑制的相关性可区分有和无亚阈值双相症状的年轻抑郁成年人(年轻抑郁成年人的情绪反应抑制)。

Neuroimaging correlates of emotional response-inhibition discriminate between young depressed adults with and without sub-threshold bipolar symptoms (Emotional Response-inhibition in Young Depressed Adults).

机构信息

Center for Behavioral Health, Cleveland Clinic.

Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:303-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.037. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many subjects with major depression (MDD) exhibit subthreshold mania symptoms (MDD+). This study investigated, for the first time, using emotional inhibition tasks, whether the neural organization of MDD+ subjects is more similar to bipolar depression (BDD) or to MDD subjects without subthreshold bipolar symptoms (MDD-).

METHOD

This study included 118 medication-free young adults (15 - 30 yrs.): 20 BDD, 28 MDD+, 41 MDD- and 29 HC subjects. Participants underwent fMRI during emotional and non-emotional Go/No-go tasks during which they responded for Go stimuli and inhibited response for happy, fear, and non-emotional (gender) faces No-go stimuli. Univariate linear mixed-effects (LME) analysis for group effects and multivariate Gaussian Process Classifier (GPC) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

MDD- group compared to both the BDD and MDD+ groups, exhibited significantly lower activation in parietal, temporal and frontal regions (cluster-wise corrected p <0.05) for emotional inhibition conditions vs. non-emotional condition. GPC classification of emotional (happy + fear) vs. non-emotional response-inhibition activation pattern showed good discrimination between BDD and MDD- subjects (AUC: 0.70; balanced accuracy: 70% (corrected p = 0.018)) as well as between MDD+ and MDD- subjects (AUC: 0.72; balanced accuracy: 67% (corrected p = 0.045)) but less efficient discrimination between BDD and MDD+ groups (AUC: 0.68; balanced accuracy: 61% (corrected p = 0.273)). Notably, classification of the MDD- group was weighted for left amygdala activation pattern.

LIMITATIONS

Results also need to be tested in a different independent dataset.

CONCLUSION

Using an fMRI emotional Go-Nogo task, MDD- subjects can be discriminated from BDD and MDD+ subjects.

摘要

背景

许多患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的患者都表现出阈下躁狂症状(MDD+)。本研究首次使用情绪抑制任务,探究 MDD+患者的神经组织与双相抑郁症(BDD)患者还是与无阈下双相症状的 MDD 患者(MDD-)更为相似。

方法

这项研究纳入了 118 名未服用药物的年轻成年人(15-30 岁):20 名 BDD 患者、28 名 MDD+患者、41 名 MDD-患者和 29 名健康对照者(HC)。参与者在进行情绪和非情绪 Go/No-go 任务时接受 fMRI 扫描,在 Go 刺激时做出反应,在高兴、恐惧和非情绪(性别)面孔 No-go 刺激时抑制反应。进行了组间效应的单变量线性混合效应(LME)分析和多元高斯过程分类器(GPC)分析。

结果

与 BDD 和 MDD+组相比,MDD-组在情绪抑制条件与非情绪条件下,顶叶、颞叶和额叶区域的激活明显较低(簇水平校正后 p<0.05)。对情绪(高兴+恐惧)与非情绪反应抑制激活模式的 GPC 分类,可很好地区分 BDD 和 MDD-患者(AUC:0.70;平衡准确性:70%(校正后 p=0.018))以及 MDD+和 MDD-患者(AUC:0.72;平衡准确性:67%(校正后 p=0.045)),但区分 BDD 和 MDD+组的效果较差(AUC:0.68;平衡准确性:61%(校正后 p=0.273))。值得注意的是,MDD-组的分类权重偏向于左侧杏仁核的激活模式。

局限性

结果还需要在不同的独立数据集进行测试。

结论

使用 fMRI 情绪 Go-Nogo 任务,可以区分 MDD-患者与 BDD 和 MDD+患者。

相似文献

7

本文引用的文献

2
A Reckoning and Research Agenda for Neuroimaging in Psychiatry.精神医学神经影像学的反思与研究议程
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 1;176(7):507-511. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19050521.
6
Differentiating between bipolar and unipolar depression in functional and structural MRI studies.在功能和结构磁共振成像研究中区分双相和单相抑郁症。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 20;91:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.03.022. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
Is the statistic value all we should care about in neuroimaging?在神经影像学中,统计值就是我们所应该关注的一切吗?
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.066. Epub 2016 Oct 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验