Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein S D, Harms J, Nazarian S
Klinik für Orthopädische Chirurgie, Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 1994;3(4):184-201. doi: 10.1007/BF02221591.
In view of the current level of knowledge and the numerous treatment possibilities, none of the existing classification systems of thoracic and lumbar injuries is completely satisfactory. As a result of more than a decade of consideration of the subject matter and a review of 1445 consecutive thoracolumbar injuries, a comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries is proposed. The classification is primarily based on pathomorphological criteria. Categories are established according to the main mechanism of injury, pathomorphological uniformity, and in consideration of prognostic aspects regarding healing potential. The classification reflects a progressive scale of morphological damage by which the degree of instability is determined. The severity of the injury in terms of instability is expressed by its ranking within the classification system. A simple grid, the 3-3-3 scheme of the AO fracture classification, was used in grouping the injuries. This grid consists of three types: A, B, and C. Every type has three groups, each of which contains three subgroups with specifications. The types have a fundamental injury pattern which is determined by the three most important mechanisms acting on the spine: compression, distraction, and axial torque. Type A (vertebral body compression) focuses on injury patterns of the vertebral body. Type B injuries (anterior and posterior element injuries with distraction) are characterized by transverse disruption either anteriorly or posteriorly. Type C lesions (anterior and posterior element injuries with rotation) describe injury patterns resulting from axial torque. The latter are most often superimposed on either type A or type B lesions. Morphological criteria are predominantly used for further subdivision of the injuries. Severity progresses from type A through type C as well as within the types, groups, and further subdivisions. The 1445 cases were analyzed with regard to the level of the main injury, the frequency of types and groups, and the incidence of neurological deficit. Most injuries occurred around the thoracolumbar junction. The upper and lower end of the thoracolumbar spine and the T10 level were most infrequently injured. Type A fractures were found in 66.1%, type B in 14.5%, and type C in 19.4% of the cases. Stable type A1 fractures accounted for 34.7% of the total. Some injury patterns are typical for certain sections of the thoracolumbar spine and others for age groups. The neurological deficit, ranging from complete paraplegia to a single root lesion, was evaluated in 1212 cases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
鉴于当前的知识水平和众多的治疗可能性,现有的胸腰椎损伤分类系统均不尽人意。经过十多年对该主题的思考以及对1445例连续性胸腰椎损伤的回顾,提出了一种胸腰椎损伤的综合分类方法。该分类主要基于病理形态学标准。根据主要损伤机制、病理形态学一致性,并考虑愈合潜力的预后因素来划分类别。该分类反映了形态学损伤的递进程度,据此确定不稳定程度。损伤在不稳定方面的严重程度通过其在分类系统中的排名来表示。采用了一种简单的网格,即AO骨折分类的3-3-3方案对损伤进行分组。这个网格由三种类型组成:A、B和C。每种类型又分为三组,每组包含三个有具体说明的亚组。这些类型具有基本的损伤模式,由作用于脊柱的三种最重要机制决定:压缩、牵张和轴向扭转。A型(椎体压缩)主要关注椎体的损伤模式。B型损伤(伴有牵张的前后部结构损伤)的特征是前部或后部的横向断裂。C型损伤(伴有旋转的前后部结构损伤)描述了由轴向扭转导致的损伤模式。后者最常叠加在A型或B型损伤之上。形态学标准主要用于对损伤进行进一步细分。严重程度从A型到C型逐渐加重,在各类型、组以及进一步细分中也是如此。对1445例病例分析了主要损伤部位、类型和组的频率以及神经功能缺损的发生率。大多数损伤发生在胸腰段交界处。胸腰椎脊柱的上端和下端以及T10水平损伤最少。在66.1%的病例中发现A型骨折,14.5%为B型,19.4%为C型。稳定的A1型骨折占总数的34.7%。某些损伤模式在胸腰椎脊柱的特定节段较为典型,而其他模式在不同年龄组中较为典型。对1212例病例评估了神经功能缺损情况,范围从完全截瘫到单根神经损伤。(摘要截选至400字)