Simonian P T, Routt M L, Harrington R M, Tencer A F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle.
J Orthop Trauma. 1994 Dec;8(6):483-9.
The purpose of this study was to compare common techniques of pubic symphyseal fixation with a new method, the "box plate," for fractures of the pelvis where the bone is osteopenic. This symphyseal fixation construct consists of two, two-hole, 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates (DCP) oriented parallel to one another. One plate is recessed within the symphysis, and the other is located on the pubic tubercles. The plates are interlocked using two 6.5-mm fully threaded screws, forming a box-like construct. To determine the mechanical properties of this construct, five fresh, cadaveric pelvic specimens with a mean age of 75 years were harvested. The femora of each specimen were potted into containers and fixed to the base of a materials testing machine. The pelvis was constrained from rotating about the hip joints by anterior and posterior restraints. A vertical compressive load was applied through the lumbar spine. Force to a magnitude of 1,000 N was applied through three cycles. Gapping motions at the symphysis pubis (SP) and the sacroiliac (SI) joints, and flexion-extension of the sacrum with respect to the ilia were measured under the following conditions: (a) intact, (b) SP ligament, unilateral anterior SI ligaments, and ipsilateral sacrospinous and sacrotuberous ligaments disrupted (anteroposterior compression type II injury), and these injuries fixed using (c) a 4.5-mm narrow two-hole DC plate placed on the superior SP held by two cancellous bone screws, (d) the DC plate well as a single 7.0-mm cannulated cancellouoffliosacral lag screw across the injured SI joint, (e) the DC plate and a five-hole 3.5-mm reconstruction plate on the anterior SP, (f) a 3.5-mm, four-hole, DC plate on the superior SP using four fully threaded screws, and (g) the box plate symphyseal construct described above. All fixations reduced SP joint gapping compared to the disrupted joint. However, all but the box plate still allowed significantly greater motion than the intact SP joint. No fixation significantly reduced SI joint gapping or sacral flexion compared to the injured state.
本研究的目的是比较耻骨联合固定的常用技术与一种新方法——“盒形钢板”,用于治疗骨质减少的骨盆骨折。这种耻骨联合固定结构由两块两孔、4.5毫米窄动力加压钢板(DCP)组成,彼此平行排列。一块钢板凹入耻骨联合内,另一块位于耻骨结节上。两块钢板用两颗6.5毫米全螺纹螺钉锁定,形成一个盒状结构。为了确定这种结构的力学性能,采集了5个平均年龄为75岁的新鲜尸体骨盆标本。每个标本的股骨被灌封到容器中并固定在材料试验机的基座上。通过前后约束装置限制骨盆绕髋关节旋转。通过腰椎施加垂直压缩载荷。在三个循环中施加大小为1000 N的力。在以下条件下测量耻骨联合(SP)和骶髂(SI)关节的间隙运动以及骶骨相对于髂骨的屈伸:(a)完整状态,(b)SP韧带、单侧前SI韧带以及同侧骶棘韧带和骶结节韧带断裂(前后压缩II型损伤),并且这些损伤用以下方法固定:(c)一块4.5毫米窄两孔DC钢板置于耻骨联合上方,用两颗松质骨螺钉固定,(d)DC钢板以及一颗7.0毫米空心骶髂拉力螺钉穿过受伤的SI关节,(e)DC钢板和一块五孔3.5毫米重建钢板置于耻骨联合前方,(f)一块3.5毫米、四孔DC钢板置于耻骨联合上方,用四颗全螺纹螺钉固定,以及(g)上述盒形钢板耻骨联合结构。与断裂的关节相比,所有固定方法均减少了SP关节的间隙。然而,除了盒形钢板外,所有其他固定方法仍允许比完整的SP关节有明显更大的运动。与损伤状态相比,没有一种固定方法能显著减少SI关节的间隙或骶骨的屈伸。