Lüscher D, Altwegg M
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
Mol Cell Probes. 1994 Aug;8(4):285-90. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.1994.1040.
We have used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect shigellae, EIEC and ETEC in stool specimens of diarrhoeic patients returning from tropical countries. As compared to culture (7.1% positive specimens), which recognizes only Shigella strains, PCR performed on bacterial growth from directly inoculated MacConkey agar plates and directed against virulence-associated genes present in both Shigella and EIEC was positive in 19.8% of the samples. We assumed that these additional positive results represent true rather than false positive samples because identical results for each single specimen were obtained using two different PCR systems and because positive results (culture as well as PCR) were exclusively found in patients with recent travel but not in those who acquired diarrhoea in a developed country where these organisms are not endemic. PCR detecting LT- and ST-specific sequences was positive in 18.5% of the patients with recent travel. Again no positive cases were identified in controls. Combining PCR and culture results, at least one bacterial pathogen was found in more than 50% of the patients with recent travel. We conclude that PCR is superior to culture methods for the detection of Shigella, EIEC and ETEC in travel-associated diarrhoea.
我们运用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测从热带国家归来的腹泻患者粪便标本中的志贺菌、肠侵袭性大肠埃希菌(EIEC)和肠产毒性大肠埃希菌(ETEC)。与仅能识别志贺菌菌株的培养法(阳性标本占7.1%)相比,对直接接种于麦康凯琼脂平板上生长的细菌进行PCR检测,并针对志贺菌和EIEC中存在的毒力相关基因,19.8%的样本呈阳性。我们认为这些额外的阳性结果代表的是真阳性而非假阳性样本,因为使用两种不同的PCR系统对每个单个标本都获得了相同的结果,而且阳性结果(培养法以及PCR法)仅在近期有旅行史的患者中发现,而在发达国家获得腹泻的患者中未发现,因为这些病原体在发达国家并非地方流行性病原体。检测LT和ST特异性序列的PCR在18.5%近期有旅行史的患者中呈阳性。同样,在对照中未发现阳性病例。综合PCR和培养结果,在超过50%近期有旅行史的患者中发现了至少一种细菌病原体。我们得出结论,在检测与旅行相关腹泻中的志贺菌、EIEC和ETEC方面,PCR优于培养方法。