Windsor J, Piché L M, Locke P A
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.
Res Dev Disabil. 1994 Nov-Dec;15(6):439-55. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(94)90028-0.
Paired and group presentation methods of preference testing were compared with eight learners with severe-profound developmental disabilities. Each presentation method was also compared with staff rankings of learners' preferences. Similar preferences were identified with both presentation methods. Although the paired presentation took more time to administer, it elicited more consistent preference information than the group presentation. Staff preference rankings were not highly correlated with either the group or paired presentation. However, items identified as most preferred by staff and by both presentation methods were similar.
对八名患有严重至极重度发育障碍的学习者，比较了偏好测试的配对呈现法和小组呈现法。每种呈现方法还与工作人员对学习者偏好的排序进行了比较。两种呈现方法都识别出了相似的偏好。虽然配对呈现法实施起来花费的时间更多，但与小组呈现法相比，它引出了更一致的偏好信息。工作人员的偏好排序与小组呈现法或配对呈现法的相关性都不高。然而，工作人员以及两种呈现方法都认定为最受偏爱的项目是相似的。
