• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年马白线生物力学特性的研究:组织咬合力大小和缝合材料与断裂强度的关系。

A study of the biomechanical properties of the adult equine linea alba: relationship of tissue bite size and suture material to breaking strength.

作者信息

Trostle S S, Wilson D G, Stone W C, Markel M D

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;23(6):435-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1994.tb00504.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1532-950x.1994.tb00504.x
PMID:7871706
Abstract

The purposes of this study were to mechanically determine the optimal tissue bite size and to evaluate seven suture materials at their largest commercially available size for breaking strength and stiffness using cadaveric adult equine linea alba. Soft tissues were removed from the abdominal fascia of 16 adult horses. Individual test sections were created from the entire linea alba and labeled (1 through 6) starting at the umbilicus and extending craniad. A single biomechanical test was performed on each test section. Tissue bite size (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 mm) significantly altered breaking strength directly in a logarithmic fashion (P < .0001; R2 = 0.94). Tissue bite size accounted for 44% and linea alba thickness for 24% of the variability in breaking strength of the equine linea alba. The optimal tissue bite size for adult horse was 15 mm from the edge of the linea alba based on lack of significant gain in breaking strength. There were no differences in breaking strength among horses, horses weight, or left and right test sections. Test sections taken from near or at the umbilicus had greater breaking strength (P < .005) and thicker linea alba (P < .001) when compared with more cranial test sections. Linea alba thickness alone accounted for 34% of the variability in breaking strength associated with test section position. There were no differences in linea alba stiffness among tissue bite sizes. All suture loops failed before complete fascial disruption, and 52 of 56 (93%) suture loops failed at the knot.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是通过机械方法确定最佳组织咬除尺寸,并使用成年马尸体的腹白线,对七种市售最大尺寸的缝合材料进行断裂强度和刚度评估。从16匹成年马的腹部筋膜中取出软组织。从整个腹白线制作单个测试切片,并从脐部开始向头侧延伸进行标记(1至6)。对每个测试切片进行一次生物力学测试。组织咬除尺寸(3、6、9、12、15、18和21毫米)以对数方式直接显著改变断裂强度(P <.0001;R2 = 0.94)。组织咬除尺寸占马腹白线断裂强度变异性的44%,腹白线厚度占24%。基于断裂强度无显著增加,成年马的最佳组织咬除尺寸是距腹白线边缘15毫米。马之间、马的体重以及左右测试切片的断裂强度没有差异。与更靠近头侧的测试切片相比,取自脐部附近或脐部的测试切片具有更高的断裂强度(P <.005)和更厚的腹白线(P <.001)。仅腹白线厚度就占与测试切片位置相关的断裂强度变异性的34%。不同组织咬除尺寸的腹白线刚度没有差异。所有缝合线环在筋膜完全破坏前均失效,56个缝合线环中有52个(93%)在结处失效。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
A study of the biomechanical properties of the adult equine linea alba: relationship of tissue bite size and suture material to breaking strength.成年马白线生物力学特性的研究:组织咬合力大小和缝合材料与断裂强度的关系。
Vet Surg. 1994 Nov-Dec;23(6):435-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1994.tb00504.x.
2
An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the breaking strength and stiffness of polydioxanone (sizes 2, 7) and polyglactin 910 (sizes 3, 6) in the equine linea alba.聚二氧六环酮(2号、7号)和聚乙交酯910(3号、6号)在马白线处的断裂强度和刚度的体外生物力学比较。
Vet Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;34(1):18-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2005.00004.x.
3
A biomechanical study of suture pullout in linea alba.白线处缝线拔出的生物力学研究。
Surgery. 1989 Nov;106(5):888-92.
4
Comparison of stainless steel fascial staples and polypropylene suture material for closure of the linea alba in dogs.不锈钢筋膜吻合钉与聚丙烯缝合材料用于犬白线闭合的比较。
Vet Surg. 1993 Nov-Dec;22(6):464-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1993.tb00423.x.
5
Tissue strength and wound morphology of the equine linea alba after ventral median celiotomy.腹正中剖腹术后马白线的组织强度和伤口形态
Vet Surg. 2000 Mar-Apr;29(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2000.00145.x.
6
In vitro biomechanical comparison of the strength of the linea alba of the llama, using two suture patterns.使用两种缝合方式对美洲驼白线强度进行的体外生物力学比较。
Am J Vet Res. 1996 Jun;57(6):938-42.
7
An in vitro comparison of two suture intervals using braided absorbable loop suture in the equine linea alba.使用编织可吸收环形缝线对马白线处两种缝线间距进行的体外比较。
Vet Surg. 2006 Apr;35(3):310-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00149.x.
8
The suture pullout characteristics of human and porcine linea alba.人体和猪腹白线的缝线拔出特性。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Apr;68:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.033. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
9
Comparison of incisional bursting strength of a bidirectional absorbable knotless suture material versus a standard continuous absorbable suture material for closure of the equine linea alba.双向可吸收免打结缝线材料与标准连续可吸收缝线材料在马腹白线缝合中的切口爆破强度比较。
Vet Surg. 2023 Nov;52(8):1121-1127. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14022. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
10
Artificial midline-fascia of the human abdominal wall for testing suture strength.
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Aug;17(8):759-65. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-9687-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Tensile testing in feline ventral abdominal coeliotomy closure with different sizes of polydioxanone suture material: a biomechanical study.不同规格聚二氧杂环己酮缝线在猫腹侧腹壁切开缝合中的拉伸试验:一项生物力学研究。
J Feline Med Surg. 2024 Sep;26(9):1098612X241271871. doi: 10.1177/1098612X241271871.
2
Ex vivo biomechanical evaluation of tissue construct strength in an equine colopexy model.马结肠固定模型中组织构建物强度的体外生物力学评估。
Vet Surg. 2025 Jan;54(1):189-198. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14117. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Optimal Suture Bite Size for Closure of Feline Linea Alba-A Cadaveric Study.
猫白线缝合闭合的最佳缝线咬口大小——一项尸体研究
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Dec 10;6:441. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00441. eCollection 2019.
4
Comparison of incisional bursting strength of 2-strand continuous crossing and simple continuous patterns for closure of the equine linea alba.马白线闭合时2股连续交叉缝合法与单纯连续缝合法切口抗破裂强度的比较
Can Vet J. 2018 Feb;59(2):171-173.
5
Ex vivo evaluation of 7 polydioxanone for closure of equine ventral midline celiotomies.7种聚二氧六环酮用于闭合马腹中线剖腹术的体外评估。
Can J Vet Res. 2014 Apr;78(2):156-60.