Trautmann M, Moldrzyk M, Vogt K, Körber J, Held T, Marre R
Department of Bacteriology, University of Ulm, Germany.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Oct;13(10):812-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02111341.
Two novel commercial IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) systems based on acid-glycine-extracted (Pyloriset IgG EIA, Orion Diagnostica) or fast protein liquid chromatography-purified (Cobas Core Anti-H. pylori EIA, Roche Diagnostic Systems) Helicobacter antigens were evaluated in a prospective study involving 127 patients. All patients underwent upper endoscopy with biopsy, and biopsies were examined for the presence of Helicobacter pylori by a rapid urease test, microscopy and culture. Of the 71 patients found to be infected with Helicobacter pylori, 69 (97.2%) and 65 (91.5%) tested positive with the Cobas Core and Pyloriset test, respectively. A detailed receiver operating characteristic analysis of the two tests showed that the Cobas Core assay was more sensitive and specific at every possible cut-off level; gave a better resolution of individual results, indicating a greater fine-sensitivity; and had no grey zone compared to a large grey zone encompassing 13.4% of the serum samples tested with the Pyloriset EIA. The Cobas Core assay appears to be a valuable tool for epidemiological purposes as well as for pre-endoscopic screening of dyspeptic patients.
在一项涉及127例患者的前瞻性研究中,对两种基于酸甘氨酸提取的幽门螺杆菌抗原(Pyloriset IgG酶免疫测定法,Orion Diagnostica)或快速蛋白质液相色谱纯化的幽门螺杆菌抗原(Cobas Core抗幽门螺杆菌酶免疫测定法,罗氏诊断系统)的新型商用IgG酶免疫测定(EIA)系统进行了评估。所有患者均接受了上消化道内镜检查及活检,并通过快速尿素酶试验、显微镜检查和培养对活检组织进行幽门螺杆菌检测。在71例被发现感染幽门螺杆菌的患者中,Cobas Core检测和Pyloriset检测分别有69例(97.2%)和65例(91.5%)呈阳性。对这两种检测的详细受试者工作特征分析表明,在每个可能的临界值水平上,Cobas Core检测都更敏感和特异;能更好地分辨个体结果,表明具有更高的精细敏感性;与Pyloriset EIA检测所涵盖的13.4%的血清样本存在较大灰色区域相比,Cobas Core检测没有灰色区域。Cobas Core检测似乎是用于流行病学目的以及消化不良患者内镜检查前筛查的一种有价值的工具。