Shulman L P, Elias S, Phillips O P, Grevengood C, Dungan J S, Simpson J L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee, Memphis.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):543-8. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199404000-00010.
To compare our initial experiences with early amniocentesis and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS).
We compared the diagnostic and pregnancy outcomes of our initial 250 patients undergoing early amniocentesis (at or before the 14th completed week of gestation) or transabdominal CVS (performed between 9.5-12.9 weeks' gestation). In both groups, the indication for prenatal diagnosis was advanced maternal age (35 years or older at estimated date of delivery).
No diagnostic errors were made using either technique, and the culture failure rate for both methods was 0.8% (two of 250). Seven cytogenetic abnormalities in the early amniocentesis group and seven in the transabdominal CVS group were detected. Nine of the 250 women undergoing early amniocentesis reported spontaneous miscarriages following the procedure, compared to five in the transabdominal CVS group. The loss rates were 3.8% in the early amniocentesis group and 2.1% in the transabdominal CVS group among continuing pregnancies. Frequencies of premature delivery, small for gestational age infants, and associated structural defects in both groups were comparable.
At this time, early amniocentesis cannot be assumed to be equal to conventional transabdominal CVS or amniocentesis with regard to safety or accuracy; only a large cohort randomized study will adequately determine the safety and efficacy of early amniocentesis.
比较我们早期羊膜腔穿刺术和经腹绒毛取样(CVS)的初步经验。
我们比较了最初250例接受早期羊膜腔穿刺术(妊娠14周或之前)或经腹CVS(妊娠9.5 - 12.9周进行)患者的诊断结果和妊娠结局。两组中,产前诊断的指征均为产妇年龄较大(预计分娩日期时35岁或以上)。
两种技术均未出现诊断错误,两种方法的培养失败率均为0.8%(250例中有2例)。早期羊膜腔穿刺术组检测到7例细胞遗传学异常,经腹CVS组检测到7例。250例接受早期羊膜腔穿刺术的女性中有9例在术后报告自然流产,经腹CVS组为5例。在持续妊娠中,早期羊膜腔穿刺术组的流产率为3.8%,经腹CVS组为2.1%。两组早产、小于胎龄儿及相关结构缺陷的发生率相当。
目前,在安全性或准确性方面,不能认为早期羊膜腔穿刺术等同于传统经腹CVS或羊膜腔穿刺术;只有大规模队列随机研究才能充分确定早期羊膜腔穿刺术的安全性和有效性。