Provenier F, Jordaens L
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Br Heart J. 1994 Aug;72(2):192-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.72.2.192.
To validate a simplified exercise protocol (the six minute walk) as a means of evaluating pacing modes and rate responsive pacemakers.
Two groups of patients with different pacemaker types (activity and dual sensor) were randomly assigned to four consecutive pacing settings (fixed rate--or VVI at 60, 85, and 110/min, and optimal rate response--or VVIR). A third group of elderly patients without arrhythmias or conduction disturbances formed a control population.
Ambulatory consultation for patients with a pacemaker in a tertiary referral centre for treatment of arrhythmias.
16 patients with rate responsive pacemakers for complete heart block and limited functional capacity and 13 controls with normal chronotropic competence.
Submaximal exercise protocol with 6 minutes walking and continuous recording of electrocardiogram.
Achieved distance and scored degree of exertion during walking in the four settings in the patients with a pacemaker; differences in rate behaviour in VVIR mode between the two pacemaker types; comparison of the pacing rate with the heart rate of the control population.
The six minute walk was performed better in VVIR than VVI 60. In VVI 85 the distance was also significantly longer than in VVI 60. The rise in pacing rate of activity pacemakers was steeper than that of the dual sensor pacemakers and differed from the heart rate in the controls at 90 seconds.
The studied test protocol was able to show differences in exercise capacity between pacing modes. Different rate responses between the evaluated sensor types could be established. The six minute walking test gives enough information to program and reprogram single chamber rate responsive pacemakers.
验证一种简化运动方案(六分钟步行试验)作为评估起搏模式和频率应答起搏器的方法。
将两组不同起搏器类型(活动型和双传感器型)的患者随机分配到四种连续的起搏设置(固定频率——即VVI,频率为60、85和110次/分钟,以及最佳频率应答——即VVIR)。第三组无心律失常或传导障碍的老年患者作为对照人群。
一家治疗心律失常的三级转诊中心为起搏器患者提供门诊咨询服务。
16例因完全性心脏传导阻滞且功能能力受限而植入频率应答起搏器的患者,以及13例变时功能正常的对照者。
进行六分钟步行的次极量运动方案,并持续记录心电图。
起搏器患者在四种设置下步行时达到的距离和劳累程度评分;两种起搏器类型在VVIR模式下频率行为的差异;起搏频率与对照人群心率的比较。
在VVIR模式下进行六分钟步行试验的效果优于VVI 60模式。在VVI 85模式下的步行距离也显著长于VVI 60模式。活动型起搏器的起搏频率上升比双传感器型起搏器更陡,且在90秒时与对照组的心率不同。
所研究的试验方案能够显示起搏模式之间运动能力的差异。可以确定所评估的传感器类型之间不同的频率应答。六分钟步行试验可为单腔频率应答起搏器的程控和重新程控提供足够的信息。