• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际问题量表的结构、效度及临床相关性。

The structure, validity and clinical relevance of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.

作者信息

Barkham M, Hardy G E, Startup M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Br J Med Psychol. 1994 Jun;67(2):171-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1994.tb01784.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1994.tb01784.x
PMID:7918212
Abstract

This paper presents preliminary data on the psychometric and clinical properties of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP: Horowitz, Rosenberg, Baer, Ureno & Villasenor, 1988) obtained from a UK sample of clients presenting with depression/anxiety for individual psychotherapy as part of two concurrent outcome studies: the Second Sheffield Psychotherapy Project (SPP2) and the Medical Research Council/NHS Collaborative Psychotherapy Project (CPP). The factor structure of the IIP is reported on a sample of 250 clients and eight factor-analytically derived scales are presented. Data on the reliability of the IIP together with its relationship to the Symptom Checklist-90R (SCL-90R: Derogatis, 1983) are investigated in a subsample of 143 clients. In addition, data are presented on the clinical relevance of the IIP using case material. The structure of the IIP was further analysed using ipsatized scores. Four bipolar factors were extracted and these findings are discussed with reference to four primary sets of social competencies.

摘要

本文呈现了人际问题量表(IIP:Horowitz、Rosenberg、Baer、Ureno和Villasenor,1988)的心理测量学和临床特性的初步数据,这些数据来自英国一个因抑郁/焦虑而接受个体心理治疗的来访者样本,该样本是两项并行结果研究的一部分:第二项谢菲尔德心理治疗项目(SPP2)和医学研究委员会/国民保健服务协作心理治疗项目(CPP)。在250名来访者的样本上报告了IIP的因子结构,并呈现了八个通过因子分析得出的量表。在143名来访者的子样本中,研究了IIP的信度数据及其与症状自评量表90修订版(SCL - 90R:Derogatis,1983)的关系。此外,利用案例材料呈现了IIP临床相关性的数据。使用个体化分数对IIP的结构进行了进一步分析。提取了四个双极因子,并参照四组主要的社会能力对这些发现进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
The structure, validity and clinical relevance of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.人际问题量表的结构、效度及临床相关性。
Br J Med Psychol. 1994 Jun;67(2):171-85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1994.tb01784.x.
2
The elusive factor structure of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.人际问题量表难以捉摸的因素结构。
Br J Med Psychol. 1995 Dec;68(4):353-69. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1995.tb01843.x.
3
Inventory of interpersonal problems: a three-dimensional balanced and scalable 48-item version.人际问题清单:一个三维平衡且可扩展的48项版本。
J Pers Assess. 2000 Apr;74(2):296-310. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7402_9.
4
[Diagnosis of interpersonal problems in depressive disorders].[抑郁症中人际问题的诊断]
Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1995;43(3):200-13.
5
The IIP-32: a short version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;35(1):21-35. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01159.x.
6
Changes in interpersonal problems in the psychotherapeutic treatment of depression as measured by the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.人际问题量表评估的抑郁症心理治疗中人际问题的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Jan 15;226:108-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.036. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
7
Sex differences in interpersonal problems: a circumplex analysis.人际关系问题中的性别差异:双交叉分析。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Dec;21(4):515-27. doi: 10.1037/a0017085.
8
Interpreting the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: subscales based on an interpersonal theory model.解读人际问题量表:基于人际理论模型的分量表
Br J Med Psychol. 1999 Sep;72(3):407-20. doi: 10.1348/000711299160095.
9
The Italian version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Personality Disorders Scales (IIP-47): psychometric properties and clinical usefulness as a screening measure.人格障碍人际问题清单 47 项量表的意大利版本:心理测量特性和作为筛查手段的临床实用性。
J Pers Disord. 2011 Aug;25(4):528-41. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.4.528.
10
Confirmatory factor analysis of the personality disorder subscales from the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems.人际问题量表中人格障碍分量表的验证性因素分析。
J Pers Assess. 1997 Oct;69(2):284-96. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6902_3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users.创伤后应激障碍检查表 DSM-5 在暴露于创伤的心理健康服务使用者样本中的心理测量特性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1863578. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1863578. eCollection 2021.
2
Latent profile analysis and principal axis factoring of the DSM-5 dissociative subtype.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版分离性亚型的潜在类别分析和主轴因子分析
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Apr 1;6:26406. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v6.26406. eCollection 2015.
3
Extreme nonresponse to acute phase cognitive therapy for depression: an attempt to replicate and extend.
抑郁症急性期认知疗法的极端无反应:一项复制与扩展的尝试。
Behav Ther. 2014 May;45(3):300-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.12.005. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
Comparative efficacy and durability of continuation phase cognitive therapy for preventing recurrent depression: design of a double-blinded, fluoxetine- and pill placebo-controlled, randomized trial with 2-year follow-up.预防复发性抑郁的延续阶段认知治疗的比较疗效和持久性:一项为期 2 年随访的双盲、氟西汀和安慰剂对照、随机试验的设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Jul;31(4):355-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 6.
5
Cluster analysis of symptoms and health seeking behaviour differentiates subgroups of patients with severe irritable bowel syndrome.对症状和就医行为的聚类分析可区分重度肠易激综合征患者的亚组。
Gut. 2003 Nov;52(11):1616-22. doi: 10.1136/gut.52.11.1616.