Fullarton G M, Bell G
Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary.
Gut. 1994 Aug;35(8):1121-6. doi: 10.1136/gut.35.8.1121.
Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly developed in the treatment of gall bladder disease in the absence of controlled clinical trial data its outcome parameters compared with open cholecystectomy remain unclear. A prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland over a two year period was carried out to attempt to assess this new procedure. A total of 45 surgeons in 19 hospitals performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy submitted prospective data from September 1990-1992. A total of 2285 cholecystectomies were audited (a completed data collection rate of 99%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in 1683 (74%) patients and completed in 1448 patients (median conversion rate to the open procedure 17%). The median operation time in the completed laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients was 100 minutes (range 30-330) and overall hospital stay three days (1-33). There were nine deaths (0.5%) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy although only two were directly attributable to the laparoscopic procedure. In the laparoscopic cholecystectomy group there were 99 complications (5.9%), 53 (3%) of these were major requiring further invasive intervention. Forty patients (2.4%) required early or delayed laparotomy for major complications such as bleeding or bile duct injuries. There were 11 (0.7%) bile duct injuries in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy series, five were noted during the initial procedure and six were recognised later resulting from jaundice or bile leaks. Ductal injuries occurred after a median of 20 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In conclusion laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly replaced open cholecystectomy in the treatment of gall bladder disease. Although the overall death and complication rate associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy is similar to open cholecystectomy, the bile duct injury rate is higher.
尽管在缺乏对照临床试验数据的情况下,腹腔镜胆囊切除术在胆囊疾病治疗中迅速发展,但其与开腹胆囊切除术相比的结果参数仍不明确。为了评估这一新技术,对苏格兰西部两年内引入腹腔镜胆囊切除术的情况进行了一项前瞻性审计。19家医院的45名外科医生进行了腹腔镜胆囊切除术,并提交了1990年9月至1992年的前瞻性数据。共审计了2285例胆囊切除术(完整数据收集率为99%)。1683例(74%)患者尝试进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术,1448例患者完成手术(转为开腹手术的中位转换率为17%)。完成腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的中位手术时间为100分钟(范围30 - 330分钟),总体住院时间为三天(1 - 33天)。腹腔镜胆囊切除术后有9例死亡(0.5%),尽管只有2例直接归因于腹腔镜手术。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术组中,有99例并发症(5.9%),其中53例(3%)为严重并发症,需要进一步的侵入性干预。40例患者(2.4%)因出血或胆管损伤等严重并发症需要早期或延迟开腹手术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术系列中有11例(0.7%)胆管损伤,5例在初始手术时被发现,6例后来因黄疸或胆汁漏被识别。胆管损伤发生在中位20例腹腔镜胆囊切除术后。总之,腹腔镜胆囊切除术在胆囊疾病治疗中已迅速取代开腹胆囊切除术。尽管与腹腔镜胆囊切除术相关的总体死亡率和并发症发生率与开腹胆囊切除术相似,但胆管损伤率更高。