Pfaller M A, Buschelman B, Bale M J, Lancaster M, Espinel-Ingroff A, Rex J H, Rinaldi M G
University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 May;19(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(94)90044-2.
This multicenter study was performed to compare a colorimetric microdilution method with the NCCLS M27-P reference macrodilution method for the testing of yeast isolates against amphotericin B, fluconazole, and 5-fluorocytosine (5FC). Testing was performed on ten yeast isolates in five independent laboratories. All sites tested each isolate a total of 20 times with both methods. MICs were read after 48 h incubation. The macrodilution MIC reference range was defined as the modal MIC +/- 1-log2 dilution for each organism-antifungal agent combination. Agreement between the M27-P reference range results and the microdilution MICs was 86% with amphotericin B, 90% with fluconazole, and 93% with 5FC. Based on these data, it is apparent that new approaches, such as the colorimetric microdilution method, will provide MIC values comparable to the M27-P macrodilution method in a format that is more practical for use in a busy clinical laboratory.
本多中心研究旨在比较比色微量稀释法与NCCLS M27-P参考常量稀释法对酵母分离株进行两性霉素B、氟康唑和5-氟胞嘧啶(5FC)药敏试验的结果。在五个独立实验室对10株酵母分离株进行了检测。所有实验室均使用两种方法对每株分离株各检测20次。孵育48小时后读取最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。常量稀释法的MIC参考范围定义为每种菌株-抗真菌药物组合的众数MIC±1个对数2稀释度。两性霉素B的M27-P参考范围结果与微量稀释法MIC的一致性为86%,氟康唑为90%,5FC为93%。基于这些数据,很明显,新方法如比色微量稀释法将以一种在繁忙临床实验室中更实用的形式提供与M27-P常量稀释法相当的MIC值。