Stovall D W, Guzick D S, Berga S L, Krasnow J S, Zeleznik A J
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pennsylvania.
Fertil Steril. 1994 Dec;62(6):1244-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57193-3.
To determine if human sperm recovery during swim-up and sperm survival after 24 hours, as obtained from a screening semen specimen, are predictive of subsequent IVF and clinical pregnancy rates (PRs) and to determine if these techniques can identify men with normal semen analysis parameters and poor IVF success.
Historical prospective study.
All semen evaluations and IVF cycles were performed at the University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Couples undergoing IVF at Magee-Womens Hospital from August 1988 through June 1993.
A screening semen analysis and swim-up procedure were performed on all couples undergoing IVF. The number of spermatozoa recovered after swim-up and the percentage of motile spermatozoa present after a 24-hour incubation were recorded.
Fertilization and PRs were compared according to the parameters obtained from routine semen analysis, the number of spermatozoa obtained with swim-up, and the percentage of motile spermatozoa at 24 hours.
Using chi2 or Fisher's exact test, fertilization rates were significantly different according to the number of spermatozoa recovered after swim-up (< or = 2.0 and > 2.0 x 10(6) spermatozoa recovered, 48.3% versus 71.4%) as were PRs (16.9% versus 29.8%). Similarly, the percentage of motile spermatozoa present at 24 hours (< or = 20% and > 20%) discriminated between fertilization rates (45.9% versus 65.8%) and PRs (16.4% versus 36.5%). Among a subset of men with normal semen analyses and total motile sperm counts > or = 40 x 10(6), the results from swim-up and survival discriminated between men with high and low fertilization and PRs. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that swim-up results better discriminated between pregnant and nonpregnant IVF patients than sperm motility, but that the percentage of motile spermatozoa present at 24 hours was no better in this regard than sperm motility.
The number of spermatozoa recovered after swim-up and the percentage of spermatozoa that maintain their motility after 24 hours were both helpful in assessing IVF and PRs and may be helpful in altering physicians to a subset of men having normal semen analysis parameters yet poor IVF success.
确定从筛查精液标本中获得的上游法回收的人类精子数量及24小时后的精子存活率,是否能预测随后的体外受精(IVF)和临床妊娠率(PRs),并确定这些技术能否识别精液分析参数正常但IVF成功率低的男性。
历史性前瞻性研究。
所有精液评估和IVF周期均在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市匹兹堡大学麦基妇女医院进行。
患者、参与者:1988年8月至1993年6月在麦基妇女医院接受IVF的夫妇。
对所有接受IVF的夫妇进行筛查精液分析和上游法操作。记录上游法回收后的精子数量以及孵育24小时后活动精子的百分比。
根据常规精液分析获得的参数、上游法获得的精子数量以及24小时时活动精子的百分比,比较受精率和PRs。
使用卡方检验或费舍尔精确检验,根据上游法回收后的精子数量(回收精子≤2.0×10⁶和>2.0×10⁶,受精率分别为48.3%和71.4%)以及PRs(分别为16.9%和29.8%),受精率有显著差异。同样,24小时时活动精子的百分比(≤20%和>20%)在受精率(分别为45.9%和65.8%)和PRs(分别为16.4%和36.5%)之间存在差异。在精液分析正常且总活动精子数≥40×10⁶的男性子集中,上游法和存活率结果在受精率和PRs高与低的男性之间存在差异。受试者操作特征分析显示,上游法结果在区分IVF妊娠和未妊娠患者方面比精子活力更好,但在这方面,24小时时活动精子的百分比并不比精子活力更好。
上游法回收后的精子数量以及24小时后保持活力的精子百分比,均有助于评估IVF和PRs,可能有助于提醒医生注意精液分析参数正常但IVF成功率低的男性子集。