Suppr超能文献

全科医生对老年人抑郁症和痴呆症的诊断:学术性详细指导能起作用吗?

General practitioner diagnosis of depression and dementia in the elderly: can academic detailing make a difference?

作者信息

Pond C D, Mant A, Kehoe L, Hewitt H, Brodaty H

机构信息

School of Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 1994 Jun;11(2):141-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.2.141.

Abstract

The objective was to improve the ability of general practitioners (GPs) to diagnose depression and dementia compared with standard screening measures. The setting was a retirement village on the outskirts of Sydney, Australia. The study used a prepost design with a 6 month follow-up. The intervention involved a visit to the GP by an academic detailer who spent 15 minutes discussing the diagnosis of depression and dementia. Ratings of depression and dementia on two occasions by GPs, and by independent interviews were made using the Geriatric Depression Scale, Mini-mental State Examination and Canberra Interview for the Elderly. In the case of depression, the level of agreement (Kappa) between the GPs and all instruments increased significantly by a factor of between 2.3 and 3.3. The doctors did not significantly improve in their agreement with the instruments on the diagnosis of dementia. An academic detailing approach to improving GPs' abilities in the diagnosis of depression can be effective. A controlled trial would be justified to confirm this finding.

摘要

目的是与标准筛查措施相比,提高全科医生(GP)诊断抑郁症和痴呆症的能力。研究地点是澳大利亚悉尼郊区的一个退休村。该研究采用前后测设计,随访6个月。干预措施包括由一名学术推广人员拜访全科医生,其花费15分钟讨论抑郁症和痴呆症的诊断。全科医生在两个时间点以及通过独立访谈,使用老年抑郁量表、简易精神状态检查表和堪培拉老年人访谈对抑郁症和痴呆症进行评分。在抑郁症方面,全科医生与所有工具之间的一致性水平(卡帕值)显著提高了2.3至3.3倍。医生在痴呆症诊断与工具的一致性方面没有显著改善。一种提高全科医生抑郁症诊断能力的学术推广方法可能是有效的。进行一项对照试验以证实这一发现是合理的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验