Seifer R, Sameroff A J, Barrett L C, Krafchuk E
E. P. Bradley Hospital, Brown University, Providence, RI 02915.
Child Dev. 1994 Oct;65(5):1478-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00830.x.
Observers and mothers rated infant behavior (n = 50) in the home on dimensions of temperament once a week for 8 weeks. Although week-to-week correlations were modest (intraclass correlations of .14-.36), aggregates of the 8 observations had high reliability for both observers and mothers. Mother reports were tied to our observation sessions by having mothers (a) rate their infants' behavior during the period when our observations were made and (b) use a questionnaire that mirrored the scoring system used for scoring the videotaped observation sessions. When direct observations were compared with mother reports (on the aggregated weekly reports and on 4 widely used questionnaires), little evidence of mother-observer correspondence was found. The interpretation of the large literature that has used maternal report is discussed, as well as the importance of direct observation of infant behavior when temperament is assessed.
观察者和母亲们连续8周每周一次在家中对50名婴儿的气质维度行为进行评分。尽管每周之间的相关性适中(组内相关系数为0.14 - 0.36),但8次观察的汇总结果对观察者和母亲来说都具有很高的可靠性。母亲的报告与我们的观察时段相关联,方法是让母亲们:(a)对我们进行观察期间婴儿的行为进行评分,以及(b)使用一份与用于对录像观察时段进行评分的评分系统相同的问卷。当将直接观察结果与母亲的报告(基于每周汇总报告以及4份广泛使用的问卷)进行比较时,几乎没有发现母亲与观察者之间存在一致性的证据。文中讨论了大量使用母亲报告的文献的解读,以及在评估气质时直接观察婴儿行为的重要性。