van Bavel J, Findlay S R, Hampel F C, Martin B G, Ratner P, Field E
Allergy Associates of Austin, Diagnostic Clinic, Tex.
Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(23):2699-704. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230086010.
We compared the efficacy and tolerability of the intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone propionate with that of the antihistamine terfenadine in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.
Two hundred thirty-two adults and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis received intranasal fluticasone propionate (200 micrograms once daily), terfenadine tablets (60 mg twice daily), or placebo for 2 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. Main outcome measures were clinician- and patient-rated individual and total nasal symptom scores (based on ratings of nasal obstruction, sneezing, nasal itching, and rhinorrhea); clinician-rated overall response to therapy; changes in nasal inflammatory cell counts; adverse events; and morning plasma cortisol concentrations.
Both clinician- and patient-rated total and individual nasal symptom scores were significantly lower in the fluticasone group than in either the terfenadine group or the placebo group at nearly every measured time point throughout the treatment period. After 2 weeks of therapy, clinician-rated total nasal symptom scores decreased by 49% in the fluticasone group compared with 27% in the terfenadine group and 19% in the placebo group. In general, therapy with terfenadine was not statistically distinguishable from that with placebo based on patient-rated total or individual nasal symptom scores. According to clinician ratings, 64% of fluticasone-treated patients compared with 49% and 44% of patients treated with terfenadine and placebo, respectively, experienced significant or moderate improvement. A greater percentage of fluticasone-treated patients compared with either terfenadine- or placebo-treated patients experienced reductions in intranasal eosinophil and basophil counts after 2 weeks of therapy. No unusual or serious drug-related adverse events were reported. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations after 2 weeks of therapy did not differ among groups.
Fluticasone aqueous nasal spray, a well-tolerated corticosteroid preparation that can be administered once daily, is more effective than terfenadine tablets or placebo in controlling symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
我们比较了鼻内用皮质类固醇丙酸氟替卡松与抗组胺药特非那定在季节性变应性鼻炎患者中的疗效和耐受性。
在一项双盲、随机、平行组研究中,232名患有季节性变应性鼻炎的成人和青少年接受了每日一次200微克的鼻内丙酸氟替卡松、每日两次60毫克的特非那定片或安慰剂治疗,为期2周。主要结局指标包括临床医生和患者评定的个体及总鼻症状评分(基于鼻阻塞、打喷嚏、鼻痒和流涕的评分);临床医生评定的对治疗的总体反应;鼻炎症细胞计数的变化;不良事件;以及早晨血浆皮质醇浓度。
在整个治疗期间的几乎每个测量时间点,丙酸氟替卡松组临床医生和患者评定的总鼻症状评分及个体鼻症状评分均显著低于特非那定组和安慰剂组。治疗2周后,丙酸氟替卡松组临床医生评定的总鼻症状评分下降了49%,而特非那定组为27%,安慰剂组为19%。总体而言,根据患者评定的总鼻症状评分或个体鼻症状评分,特非那定治疗与安慰剂治疗在统计学上无显著差异。根据临床医生的评定,接受丙酸氟替卡松治疗的患者中有64%出现显著或中度改善,而接受特非那定和安慰剂治疗的患者分别为49%和44%。与特非那定或安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受丙酸氟替卡松治疗的患者在治疗2周后鼻内嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞计数降低的比例更高。未报告异常或严重的药物相关不良事件。治疗2周后各治疗组早晨血浆皮质醇浓度无差异。
丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂是一种耐受性良好的皮质类固醇制剂,每日给药一次,在控制季节性变应性鼻炎症状方面比特非那定片或安慰剂更有效。