Suppr超能文献

鼻内用皮质类固醇与口服H1受体拮抗剂治疗变应性鼻炎的随机对照试验系统评价

Intranasal corticosteroids versus oral H1 receptor antagonists in allergic rhinitis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Weiner J M, Abramson M J, Puy R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3181, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 1998 Dec 12;317(7173):1624-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1624.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether intranasal corticosteroids are superior to oral H1 receptor antagonists (antihistamines) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing intranasal corticosteroids with oral antihistamines.

SETTING

Randomised controlled trials conducted worldwide and published between 1966 and 1997.

SUBJECTS

2267 subjects with allergic rhinitis in 16 randomised controlled trials.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Nasal blockage, nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal itch, postnasal drip, nasal discomfort, total nasal symptoms, nasal resistance, and eye symptoms and global ratings. Outcomes measured on different scales were combined to determine pooled odds ratios (categorical outcomes) or standardised mean differences (continuous outcomes). Assessment of heterogeneity between studies, and subgroup analyses of eye symptoms, were undertaken.

RESULTS

Intranasal corticosteroids produced significantly greater relief than oral antihistamines of nasal blockage (standardised mean difference 0.63, 95% confidence interval - 0.73 to - 0.53), nasal discharge (-0.5, - 0.6 to - 0.4), sneezing (- 0.49, - 0.59 to - 0.39), nasal itch (- 0.38,- 0.49 to - 0.21), postnasal drip (- 0.24,- 0.42 to - 0.06), and total nasal symptoms (- 0.42,- 0.53 to - 0.32), and global ratings gave an odds ratio for deterioration of symptoms of 0.26 (0.08 to 0.8). There were no significant differences between treatments for nasal discomfort, nasal resistance, or eye symptoms. The effects on sneezing, total nasal symptoms, and eye symptoms were significantly heterogeneous between studies. Other combined outcomes were homogeneous between studies. Subgroup analysis of the outcome of eye symptoms suggested that the duration of assessment (averaged mean score over the study period versus mean score at end of study period) might have accounted for the heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review, together with data on safety and cost effectiveness, support the use of intranasal corticosteroids over oral antihistamines as first line treatment for allergic rhinitis.

摘要

目的

确定鼻内用皮质类固醇在治疗变应性鼻炎方面是否优于口服H1受体拮抗剂(抗组胺药)。

设计

对比较鼻内用皮质类固醇与口服抗组胺药的随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。

研究背景

1966年至1997年间在全球范围内开展并发表的随机对照试验。

研究对象

16项随机对照试验中的2267例变应性鼻炎患者。

主要观察指标

鼻塞、流涕、打喷嚏、鼻痒、鼻后滴漏、鼻部不适、鼻部总体症状、鼻阻力、眼部症状及整体评分。将不同量表测量的结果合并,以确定合并比值比(分类结果)或标准化均数差(连续结果)。对各研究间的异质性进行评估,并对眼部症状进行亚组分析。

结果

鼻内用皮质类固醇在缓解鼻塞(标准化均数差0.63,95%可信区间-0.73至-0.53)、流涕(-0.5,-0.6至-0.4)、打喷嚏(-0.49,-0.59至-0.39)、鼻痒(-0.38,-0.49至-0.21)、鼻后滴漏(-0.24,-0.42至-0.06)及鼻部总体症状(-0.42,-0.53至-0.32)方面显著优于口服抗组胺药,整体评分显示症状恶化的比值比为0.26(0.08至0.8)。在鼻部不适、鼻阻力或眼部症状方面,两种治疗方法无显著差异。各研究间在打喷嚏、鼻部总体症状及眼部症状方面的效应存在显著异质性。其他合并结果在各研究间具有同质性。眼部症状结果的亚组分析表明,评估持续时间(研究期间平均得分与研究期末得分)可能是异质性的原因。

结论

本系统评价的结果,连同安全性和成本效益数据,支持将鼻内用皮质类固醇作为变应性鼻炎的一线治疗,优于口服抗组胺药。

相似文献

7
Capsaicin for non-allergic rhinitis.辣椒素用于非过敏性鼻炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD010591. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010591.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Allergic rhinitis.变应性鼻炎
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Dec 27;20(Suppl 3):74. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00923-6.
8
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Sep;68(9):e268-e269. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6809e268.
9
Antihistamines for allergic rhinosinusitis.用于变应性鼻-鼻窦炎的抗组胺药。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Sep;68(9):670. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6809670.

本文引用的文献

6
Changing strategies in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.变应性鼻炎治疗策略的转变
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Oct;77(4):255-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63315-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验