Stryker J, Samuels S E, Smith M D
Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California at San Francisco.
Am J Public Health. 1994 Dec;84(12):1901-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.12.1901.
This article examines the impact of contentious local debates on the design and implementation of school-based condom availability programs.
Information about condom availability in schools was reviewed by 50 leading educators and health officials at a 1992 forum held in Menlo Park, Calif.
Few existing condom availability programs were designed to yield definitive data on sexual risk-taking behavior or other measures of program effectiveness.
In the debate over school-based condom availability programs, as in many aspects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention programs, scientific, moral, and political concerns overlap. Behavioral research into the potential effectiveness of such programs can help inform debates about fundamental values concerning sexual decision making and privacy, family integrity and parental autonomy, and public health.
本文探讨了有争议的地方辩论对校内提供避孕套项目的设计与实施的影响。
1992年在加利福尼亚州门洛帕克举行的一次论坛上,50位主要教育工作者和卫生官员对学校提供避孕套的相关信息进行了审查。
现有的避孕套提供项目中,很少有旨在产生关于性冒险行为或其他项目有效性衡量标准的确切数据的。
在校内提供避孕套项目的辩论中,如同在人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)预防项目的许多方面一样,科学、道德和政治问题相互交织。对这类项目潜在有效性的行为研究有助于为有关性决策和隐私、家庭完整与父母自主权以及公共卫生等基本价值观的辩论提供信息。