Mahy I R, Shore A C, Smith L D, Tooke J E
Department of Vascular Medicine, University of Exeter, Postgraduate Medical School, United Kingdom.
Cardiovasc Res. 1994 Oct;28(10):1555-8. doi: 10.1093/cvr/28.10.1555.
The aim was to assess whether atrial fibrillation results in disturbances of capillary pressure and capillary filtration coefficient in man.
Finger nailfold capillary pressure and calf capillary filtration coefficient were measured in subjects in atrial fibrillation and in matched healthy controls in sinus rhythm. Capillary pressure was measured by direct cannulation using an electronic resistance feedback servonulling technique, and capillary filtration coefficient by mercury-in-Silastic strain gauge plethysmography using a technique believed not to invoke the venoarteriolar response.
Mean capillary pressure did not differ significantly between subjects in atrial fibrillation and those in sinus rhythm [18.4(SD 5.1) mm Hg in atrial fibrillation v 18.0(2.9) mm Hg in sinus rhythm]. In a subgroup of patients restored to sinus rhythm (n = 7) by dc cardioversion there was no significant alteration in capillary pressure [15.3(4.2) mm Hg v 16.6(2.8) mm Hg]. Capillary filtration coefficient was also similar in subjects in atrial fibrillation to that in healthy controls in sinus rhythm [2.81(0.65) kfu in atrial fibrillation v 2.87(0.69) kfu in sinus rhythm].
These data would suggest that under resting conditions autoregulatory mechanisms are able to preserve microvascular homeostasis despite the central changes associated with atrial fibrillation.
评估心房颤动是否会导致人体毛细血管压力和毛细血管滤过系数紊乱。
对心房颤动患者和窦性心律的匹配健康对照者测量指甲襞毛细血管压力和小腿毛细血管滤过系数。毛细血管压力采用电子电阻反馈伺服零位技术直接插管测量,毛细血管滤过系数采用硅橡胶应变片汞柱体积描记法测量,该技术被认为不会引发小静脉动脉反应。
心房颤动患者与窦性心律患者的平均毛细血管压力无显著差异[心房颤动患者为18.4(标准差5.1)mmHg,窦性心律患者为18.0(2.9)mmHg]。在通过直流电复律恢复窦性心律的患者亚组(n = 7)中,毛细血管压力无显著变化[15.3(4.2)mmHg对16.6(2.8)mmHg]。心房颤动患者的毛细血管滤过系数与窦性心律的健康对照者也相似[心房颤动患者为2.81(0.65)kfu,窦性心律患者为2.87(0.69)kfu]。
这些数据表明,在静息状态下,尽管存在与心房颤动相关的中枢性变化,但自身调节机制能够维持微血管内环境稳定。