Rouby J J, Poète P, Martin de Lassale E, Nicolas M H, Bodin L, Jarlier V, Korinek A M, Viars P
Département d'Anesthésie, Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière, Université Paris VI, France.
Intensive Care Med. 1994;20(3):187-92. doi: 10.1007/BF01704698.
To evaluate the efficiency of intratracheal colistin in preventing nosocomial bronchopneumonia (BPN) in the critically ill.
Study evaluating the clinical incidence of nosocomial BPN in 2 groups of critically ill patients who receive or did not receive intratracheal colistin. BPN was assessed clinically in survivors and histologically in non-survivors.
A 14-bed surgical intensive care unit.
598 consecutive critically ill patients were studied during a prospective non-randomized study over a 40-month period.
251 patients--31 non-survivors and 220 survivors--did not receive intratracheal colistin and 347-42 non-survivors and 305 survivors--received intratracheal colistin for a 2-week period (1,600,000 units per 24 h).
The incidence of nosocomial BPN was evaluated clinically in survivors, using repeated protected minibronchoalveolar lavages, and histologically in non-survivors via an immediate postmortem pneumonectomy (histologic and semi-quantitative bacteriologic analysis of one lung). The clinical incidence of nosocomial BPN was of 37% in coli (-) survivors and of 27% in coli (+) survivors (p < 0.01). This result was histologically confirmed in non-survivors, where the incidence of histologic BPN was of 61% in coli (-) patients and of 36% in coli (+) patients (p < 0.001). Emergence of BPN due to colistin-resistant micro-organisms was not observed. Because colistin was successful in preventing Gram-negative BPN and did not change the absolute number of Gram-positive BPN, the proportion of BPN caused by staphylococcus species was higher in group coli (+) patients (33% vs 16%). Mortality was not significantly influenced by the administration of colistin.
This study suggests that the administration of intratracheal colistin during a 2-week period significantly reduces the incidence of Gram-negative BPN without creating an increasing number of BPN due to colistin-resistant micro-organisms.
评估气管内使用黏菌素预防重症患者医院获得性支气管肺炎(BPN)的效果。
对两组接受或未接受气管内黏菌素治疗的重症患者医院获得性BPN的临床发病率进行研究。对幸存者进行临床评估,对非幸存者进行组织学评估。
一个拥有14张床位的外科重症监护病房。
在一项为期40个月的前瞻性非随机研究中,对598例连续的重症患者进行了研究。
251例患者(31例非幸存者和220例幸存者)未接受气管内黏菌素治疗,347例患者(42例非幸存者和305例幸存者)接受了为期2周的气管内黏菌素治疗(每24小时160万单位)。
对幸存者采用重复的保护性微型支气管肺泡灌洗进行临床评估医院获得性BPN的发病率,对非幸存者通过死后立即进行肺切除术(对一侧肺进行组织学和半定量细菌学分析)进行组织学评估。医院获得性BPN的临床发病率在大肠杆菌(-)幸存者中为37%,在大肠杆菌(+)幸存者中为27%(p<0.01)。这一结果在非幸存者的组织学检查中得到证实,其中组织学BPN的发病率在大肠杆菌(-)患者中为61%,在大肠杆菌(+)患者中为36%(p<0.001)。未观察到由耐黏菌素微生物引起的BPN。由于黏菌素成功预防了革兰氏阴性菌BPN,且未改变革兰氏阳性菌BPN的绝对数量,因此在大肠杆菌(+)组患者中,由葡萄球菌属引起的BPN比例更高(33%对16%)。黏菌素的使用对死亡率没有显著影响。
本研究表明,为期2周的气管内使用黏菌素可显著降低革兰氏阴性菌BPN的发病率,且不会因耐黏菌素微生物导致BPN数量增加。