Suppr超能文献

医生能有效地促进自行车头盔的购买吗?

[Can physicians efficaciously promote the purchase of bicycle helmets?].

作者信息

Labrecque M, Dostaler L P, Houde A, Boissonneault J, Grimard M, Paradis A

机构信息

Département de médecine familiale de l'Université Laval, Québec.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 1994 Jun;40:1132-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of physician intervention in the purchase of bicycle helmets. DESIGN: Randomized single-blind controlled trial; randomization by clusters. SETTING: July 11, 1992, cycling path in Beauport, Quebec. PARTICIPANTS: Non-helmeted cyclists riding alone and groups of two to six cyclists in which at least one member was not wearing a helmet were invited to participate in the study; 274 individuals or groups of cyclists (total n = 485 cyclists) were randomized for the study. INTERVENTION: For the study group a physician handed out and explained the Canadian Medical Association's (CMA) pamphlet on bicycle helmets. This pamphlet includes a discount coupon for the purchase of a helmet. All of the participants in both the study group and the control group completed a questionnaire, including queries about sociodemographic characteristics, name, and telephone number. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportion of previously non-helmeted cyclists purchasing a helmet within 2 to 3 weeks of the intervention. RESULTS: Telephone contact was made with 340 of the 416 non-helmeted cyclists (from 224 groups of cyclists). Of the 174 cyclists who had received a CMA pamphlet, 13.8% (n = 24) had purchased a helmet, compared to 3.0% (n = 5) of the 166 control group cyclists (RR = 4.6, 95% CL = 1.8-11.7). Similar results were achieved by cluster analysis of cyclists. CONCLUSION: Physician intervention using the CMA pamphlet could be effective in promoting the purchase of bicycle helmets.

摘要

目的

评估医生干预对购买自行车头盔的有效性。

设计

随机单盲对照试验;整群随机分组。

地点

1992年7月11日,魁北克省博波尔的自行车道。

参与者

邀请独自骑行且未戴头盔的骑行者以及由两至六名骑行者组成且至少有一名成员未戴头盔的群体参与研究;274名个体或骑行者群体(共485名骑行者)被随机分组参与研究。

干预措施

对于研究组,医生发放并讲解了加拿大医学协会(CMA)关于自行车头盔的宣传册。该宣传册包含购买头盔的折扣券。研究组和对照组的所有参与者均完成了一份问卷,包括社会人口学特征、姓名和电话号码等问题。

主要观察指标

干预后2至3周内,之前未戴头盔的骑行者购买头盔的比例。

结果

对416名未戴头盔的骑行者(来自224个骑行者群体)中的340人进行了电话随访。在收到CMA宣传册的174名骑行者中,13.8%(n = 24)购买了头盔,而对照组的166名骑行者中这一比例为3.0%(n = 5)(相对危险度 = 4.6,95%可信区间 = 1.8 - 11.7)。对骑行者进行整群分析也得到了类似结果。

结论

使用CMA宣传册进行医生干预可能有助于促进自行车头盔的购买。

相似文献

7
Fatal cycling injuries.致命的自行车事故伤害
Sports Med. 1995 Nov;20(5):348-62. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199520050-00006.
10
Bicycle helmet size, adjustment, and stability.自行车头盔的尺寸、调整和稳定性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16:268-75. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.931948. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

3
The epidemiology of injuries to bicycle riders.自行车骑行者受伤的流行病学。
Pediatr Clin North Am. 1985 Feb;32(1):141-51. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)34762-9.
5
Helmet protection from head injuries among recreational bicyclists.
Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):96-7. doi: 10.1177/036354659001800116.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验