van der Wal G, Dillmann R J
Medical Inspectorate of Health, Province of North-Holland, Haarlem, Netherlands.
BMJ. 1994 May 21;308(6940):1346-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6940.1346.
The practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands is often used as an argument in debates outside the Netherlands--hence a clear description of the Dutch situation is important. This article summarises recent data and discusses conceptual issues and relevant characteristics of the system of health care. Special emphasis is put on regulation, including relevant data on notification and prosecution. Besides the practice of euthanasia the Dutch are confronted with the gaps in reporting of cases to the public prosecutor and the existence of cases of ending a life without an explicit request. Nevertheless, the "Dutch experiment" need not inevitably lead down the slippery slope because of the visibility and openness of this part of medical practice. This will lead to increased awareness, more safeguards, and improvement of medical decisions concerning the end of life.
荷兰的安乐死做法在荷兰境外的辩论中常被用作论据——因此,清晰描述荷兰的情况很重要。本文总结了近期数据,并讨论了医疗保健体系的概念问题和相关特征。特别强调了监管,包括关于通报和起诉的相关数据。除了安乐死做法外,荷兰人还面临着向检察官报告案件的漏洞以及存在未经明确请求而结束生命的情况。然而,由于这部分医疗实践的可见性和开放性,“荷兰实验”不一定会不可避免地导致滑坡效应。这将提高认识、增加保障措施,并改善有关生命终结的医疗决策。