• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用最敏感或特异的诊断测试来排除或确诊疾病:捷径还是歧途?

Ruling out or ruling in disease with the most sensitive or specific diagnostic test: short cut or wrong turn?

作者信息

Boyko E J

机构信息

Medical Service, VA Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98108.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1994 Apr-Jun;14(2):175-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400210.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X9401400210
PMID:8028470
Abstract

Previous publications have advocated that clinicians choose the most sensitive diagnostic test to rule out disease and the most specific diagnostic test to rule in disease. This paper critically examines the validity of these recommendations. First, the author finds that following these recommendations does not lead to the highest disease probability for a positive test result (thereby best ruling in disease) or the lowest disease probability for a negative test result (thereby best ruling out disease). In general, the ability of a diagnostic test to lead to the highest (rule in) or lowest (rule out) disease probability should be judged based on likelihood ratios. Next, by comparing expected utilities, the author considers whether the most specific test leads to the best clinical outcome when a rule-in strategy is clinically advisable, i.e., when the costs of false-positive results are high, and whether the most sensitive test leads to the best clinical outcome when a rule-out strategy is clinically advisable, i.e., when the costs of false-negative results are high. The author again demonstrates that the greatest clinical utility is not always achieved by using the most specific test in a rule-in decision or the most sensitive test in a rule-out decision. Tradeoffs between sensitivity, specificity, disease probability, and utilities of correct and incorrect disease classifications by the diagnostic test must be simultaneously captured to determine which strategy maximizes clinical utility.

摘要

以往的文献主张临床医生选择最敏感的诊断试验来排除疾病,选择最特异的诊断试验来确诊疾病。本文批判性地审视了这些建议的有效性。首先,作者发现遵循这些建议并不能使阳性检测结果的疾病概率最高(从而最好地确诊疾病),也不能使阴性检测结果的疾病概率最低(从而最好地排除疾病)。一般来说,诊断试验导致最高(确诊)或最低(排除)疾病概率的能力应根据似然比来判断。接下来,通过比较预期效用,作者考虑当确诊策略在临床上可行时,即假阳性结果的成本很高时,最特异的试验是否能带来最佳临床结果;以及当排除策略在临床上可行时,即假阴性结果的成本很高时,最敏感的试验是否能带来最佳临床结果。作者再次证明,在确诊决策中使用最特异的试验或在排除决策中使用最敏感的试验并不总是能实现最大的临床效用。必须同时考虑诊断试验的敏感性、特异性、疾病概率以及正确和错误疾病分类的效用之间的权衡,以确定哪种策略能使临床效用最大化。

相似文献

1
Ruling out or ruling in disease with the most sensitive or specific diagnostic test: short cut or wrong turn?使用最敏感或特异的诊断测试来排除或确诊疾病:捷径还是歧途?
Med Decis Making. 1994 Apr-Jun;14(2):175-9. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9401400210.
2
Assessing the gain in diagnostic performance when combining two diagnostic tests.评估两种诊断测试联合使用时诊断性能的提升情况。
Stat Med. 2002 Sep 15;21(17):2527-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.1227.
3
Clinical prediction rules in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia demonstrate the usefulness of reporting likelihood ratios in infectious diseases.金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症的临床预测规则证明了在传染病中报告似然比的有用性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;35(9):1393-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2711-z. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
4
Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.运用证据确定诊断试验的效能。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2009;6(2):87-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
5
Selecting diagnostic tests for ruling out or ruling in disease: the use of the Kullback-Leibler distance.选择用于排除或确诊疾病的诊断测试:库尔贝克-莱布勒散度的应用
Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;28(3):521-5. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.3.521.
6
Diagnosing tests: using and misusing diagnostic and screening tests.诊断测试:诊断和筛查测试的使用与误用
J Pers Assess. 2003 Dec;81(3):209-19. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8103_03.
7
The diagnostic utility of multiple-level likelihood ratios.多级似然比的诊断效用。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 Sep;15(5):769-76. doi: 10.1017/S1355617709990373. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
8
The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986 Aug;110(8):689-93.
9
Comparing Rasch analyses probability estimates to sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios when examining the utility of medical diagnostic tests.在检验医学诊断试验的效用时,比较Rasch分析概率估计值与敏感度、特异度及似然比。
J Appl Meas. 2005;6(2):180-201.
10
[Studies about diagnostic tests: interpreting the results].[关于诊断测试的研究:解读结果]
Rev Med Chil. 2008 Sep;136(9):1203-8. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Glioblastoma Treatment Response Using Machine Learning Approach Based on Magnetic Resonance Images Radiomics: An Exploratory Study.基于磁共振图像放射组学的机器学习方法评估胶质母细胞瘤治疗反应:一项探索性研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 30;8(1):e70323. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70323. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Biomarkers and Data Visualization of Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Syndrome: An Applicable Approach.胰岛素抵抗与代谢综合征的生物标志物及数据可视化:一种适用方法。
Life (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;14(9):1197. doi: 10.3390/life14091197.
3
Electrical Impedance Tomography, Artificial Intelligence, and Variable Ventilation: Transforming Respiratory Monitoring and Treatment in Critical Care.
电阻抗断层成像、人工智能与可变通气:变革重症监护中的呼吸监测与治疗
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 24;14(7):677. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070677.
4
Performance of diagnostic tests based on continuous bivariate markers.基于连续双变量标志物的诊断试验性能
J Appl Stat. 2022 Oct 26;51(3):497-514. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2022.2137478. eCollection 2024.
5
Machine learning-directed electrical impedance tomography to predict metabolically vulnerable plaques.机器学习导向的电阻抗断层成像技术用于预测代谢易损斑块。
Bioeng Transl Med. 2023 Oct 20;9(1):e10616. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10616. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Evaluation of the Daily Change in PaO/FiO Ratio as a Predictor of Abnormal Chest X-rays in Intensive Care Unit Patients Post Mechanical Ventilation Weaning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.评估机械通气撤机后 ICU 患者的 PaO/FiO 比值日变化率预测异常胸部 X 线的价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb 17;58(2):303. doi: 10.3390/medicina58020303.
7
Statistical methods for evaluating the fine needle aspiration cytology procedure in breast cancer diagnosis.统计方法在乳腺癌诊断中的细针穿刺细胞学检查评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 6;22(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01506-y.
8
Capturing adolescents in need of psychiatric care with psychopathological symptoms: A population-based cohort study.捕捉有精神病理症状的需要精神科护理的青少年:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 29;64(1):e76. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2251.
9
Doppler Echocardiography Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function in Patients With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.心绞痛且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉微血管功能的多普勒超声心动图评估
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Oct 29;8:723542. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.723542. eCollection 2021.
10
Diagnostic performance of the modified Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for thyroid malignancy according to nodule size: a comparison with five society guidelines.根据结节大小评估改良韩国甲状腺影像报告和数据系统对甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断效能:与五项学会指南的比较
Ultrasonography. 2021 Oct;40(4):474-485. doi: 10.14366/usg.20148. Epub 2020 Dec 9.