Aoun M, Van der Auwera P, Varthalitis I, Bourguignon A M, Janssen M, Daneau D, Meunier F
Infectious Diseases Clinic, Institut J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
Support Care Cancer. 1994 May;2(3):191-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00417480.
A randomized prospective study comparing pefloxacin to teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive infections in cancer patients was prematurely terminated because of the emergence of pefloxacin resistance associated with oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Among 56 patients evaluated for efficacy (26 pefloxacin and 30 teicoplanin) and infected with bacteria susceptible to both antibiotics, the clinical cure and eradication rates were similar for pefloxacin (80.5% and 77.3% respectively) and teicoplanin (66.6% and 52.2% respectively). The relapse rates (15% and 10% for pefloxacin and teicoplanin respectively) and the overall mortalities within 1 month (42% and 31%) were similar.
一项比较培氟沙星与替考拉宁治疗癌症患者革兰氏阳性感染的随机前瞻性研究由于在金黄色葡萄球菌和凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌中出现与苯唑西林耐药相关的培氟沙星耐药而提前终止。在56例接受疗效评估的患者(26例使用培氟沙星,30例使用替考拉宁)中,感染的细菌对两种抗生素均敏感,培氟沙星的临床治愈率和根除率分别为80.5%和77.3%,替考拉宁分别为66.6%和52.2%。复发率(培氟沙星和替考拉宁分别为15%和10%)以及1个月内的总死亡率(42%和31%)相似。