• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险评估、环境与公共卫生。

Risk assessment, the environment, and public health.

作者信息

Rodricks J V

机构信息

ENVIRON International Corporation, Arlington, VA 22203.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Mar;102(3):258-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102258.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.94102258
PMID:8033856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1567122/
Abstract

Risks to human health arise from the environment in diverse ways and from many sources. Although there are many social forces to be considered when efforts are made to protect human health, it would seem that public health resources should be devoted to reducing risks arising from the environment in at least rough proportion to the toll they take on human health. Risk assessment, properly, conceived and practiced, is the appropriate tool for assigning risks their rightful order and should be a principal component of public health programs everywhere. The successful application of risk assessments to such goals depends on the developments of a broader view of its nature and content than has been customarily adopted.

摘要

人类健康面临的风险以多种方式、来自众多源头,源于环境。尽管在努力保护人类健康时需要考虑诸多社会因素,但公共卫生资源似乎应至少大致按对人类健康造成的损害比例,投入到降低源于环境的风险中。合理构思并实施的风险评估,是对风险进行合理排序的恰当工具,应成为各地公共卫生项目的主要组成部分。将风险评估成功应用于此类目标,取决于对其性质和内容形成比以往通常采用的更为宽泛的认识。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2605/1567122/95e240718f8b/envhper00391-0015-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2605/1567122/95e240718f8b/envhper00391-0015-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2605/1567122/95e240718f8b/envhper00391-0015-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk assessment, the environment, and public health.风险评估、环境与公共卫生。
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Mar;102(3):258-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102258.
2
The implementation of medical monitoring programs following potentially hazardous exposures: a medico-legal perspective.潜在危险暴露后医学监测计划的实施:法医学视角
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2017 Nov;55(9):956-969. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2017.1334913. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Wireless smart meters and public acceptance: the environment, limited choices, and precautionary politics.无线智能电表与公众接受度:环境、有限选择与预防性政治
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Aug;23(6):688-702. doi: 10.1177/0963662512464936.
5
[Inequalities in health in Italy].[意大利的健康不平等现象]
Epidemiol Prev. 2004 May-Jun;28(3 Suppl):i-ix, 1-161.
6
[The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].[预防原则:优势与风险]
J Chir (Paris). 2001 Apr;138(2):68-80.
7
Policy and science in children's health and environment: recommendations from the PINCHE project.儿童健康与环境方面的政策与科学:PINCHE项目的建议
Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006 Oct;95(453):114-9. doi: 10.1080/08035320600886653.
8
Public injection settings in Vancouver: physical environment, social context and risk.温哥华的公共注射场所:物理环境、社会背景与风险
Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Jan;18(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2006.11.019. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
9
Real world reviews: a beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions.真实世界评价:公共卫生政策干预措施系统评价初学者指南。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Jan;65(1):14-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.088740. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
10
Lessons from 12 years of comparative risk projects.12年比较风险项目的经验教训。
Annu Rev Public Health. 1999;20:159-72. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.159.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative risk assessment: an emerging tool for emerging foodborne pathogens.定量风险评估:一种针对新出现的食源性病原体的新兴工具。
Emerg Infect Dis. 1997 Oct-Dec;3(4):483-7. doi: 10.3201/eid0304.970411.
2
Regulatory reform proposals and the public health.监管改革提案与公共卫生。
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104(4):356-61. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104356.

本文引用的文献

1
"Safety" testing of carcinogenic agents.致癌物质的“安全性”测试。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1961 Aug;27:455-70.
2
Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors.不确定性(安全性)因素的监管历史与实验依据。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1983 Sep;3(3):224-38. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(83)90030-2.
3
Editorial: The Delaney Clause and a scheme for rewarding good experimentation.社论:《德莱尼条款》与奖励良好实验的方案。
Prev Med. 1973 Mar;2(1):165-70. doi: 10.1016/0091-7435(73)90022-4.
4
One-hit models of carcinogenesis: conservative or not?致癌作用的单 hit 模型:是否保守?
Risk Anal. 1988 Dec;8(4):485-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01189.x.
5
Monte Carlo techniques for quantitative uncertainty analysis in public health risk assessments.公共卫生风险评估中用于定量不确定性分析的蒙特卡罗技术。
Risk Anal. 1992 Mar;12(1):53-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb01307.x.