• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监管改革提案与公共卫生。

Regulatory reform proposals and the public health.

作者信息

Buffler P A, Kyle A D

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley 94720-7360, USA.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104(4):356-61. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104356.

DOI:10.1289/ehp.96104356
PMID:8732938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1469327/
Abstract

The U.S. Congress is considering legislation that would change policy for environmental health in important ways. Current approaches have been criticized for addressing the wrong set of priorities and consuming too many resources. The legislation requires additional analyses and sets new decision criteria to be applied to federal agency actions taken to protect the environment and public health. Close review of the legislation suggests that though it is intended to address identified problems, it is unlikely to lead to an improved basis for public policy and is likely to paralyze the regulatory process. Reform proposals that reduce rather than increase fragmentation of decision-making and that address problems comprehensively rather than selectively are needed.

摘要

美国国会正在考虑一项会在重要方面改变环境卫生政策的立法。当前的方法因处理了错误的优先事项且消耗了过多资源而受到批评。该立法要求进行额外分析,并设定新的决策标准,以应用于联邦机构为保护环境和公众健康而采取的行动。对该立法的仔细审查表明,尽管其旨在解决已发现的问题,但不太可能为公共政策带来更好的基础,反而可能使监管过程陷入瘫痪。需要提出减少而非增加决策碎片化、全面而非选择性地解决问题的改革提案。

相似文献

1
Regulatory reform proposals and the public health.监管改革提案与公共卫生。
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Apr;104(4):356-61. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104356.
2
How Can Economics Advance Prevention?经济学如何推动预防工作?
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5 Suppl 1):S4-S5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.015.
3
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
4
Precautionary principles: a jurisdiction-free framework for decision-making under risk.预防原则:一个无管辖权的风险决策框架。
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2004 Dec;23(12):579-600. doi: 10.1191/0960327104ht482oa.
5
A new approach to risk assessment integrating scientific evaluation and economic assessment of costs and benefits.一种将科学评估与成本效益经济评估相结合的风险评估新方法。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Oct;24(2 Pt 1):121-5. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0117.
6
Human health and the environment can't wait for reform: current opportunities for the federal government and states to address chemical risks under the Toxic Substances Control Act.人类健康与环境等不起改革:联邦政府与各州依据《有毒物质控制法》应对化学风险的当前机遇。
Am Univ Law Rev. 2011;61(2):385-430.
7
Risk assessment and cost-benefit analyses: in the public interest?风险评估与成本效益分析:符合公共利益吗?
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Oct;101(5):408-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101408.
8
Foreword: environmental policy: principles for the next generation of protection.前言:环境政策:下一代保护原则
Am J Law Med. 2004;30(2-3):115-7. doi: 10.1177/009885880403000201.
9
Gauging the price of good health.衡量健康的代价。
Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Oct 1;37(19):365A-368A. doi: 10.1021/es032574k.
10
The precautionary principle in times of intermingled uncertainty and risk: some regulatory complexities.不确定性与风险交织时期的预防原则:一些监管复杂性
Water Sci Technol. 2005;52(6):35-41.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.烟草行业为挫败职业安全与健康管理局的室内空气质量规定所做的努力。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):585-92. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.585.

本文引用的文献

1
Science and judgement in risk assessment: needs and opportunities.风险评估中的科学与判断:需求与机遇
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Nov;102(11):908-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102908.
2
Risk assessment, the environment, and public health.风险评估、环境与公共卫生。
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Mar;102(3):258-64. doi: 10.1289/ehp.94102258.
3
Strange brew: assessing risk of chemical mixtures.奇特的混合物:评估化学混合物的风险。
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Feb;103(2):142-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103142.
4
A molecular approach to cancer risk.一种针对癌症风险的分子方法。
Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):356-7. doi: 10.1126/science.7716533.
5
Epidemiology faces its limits.流行病学面临着其局限性。
Science. 1995 Jul 14;269(5221):164-9. doi: 10.1126/science.7618077.