Suppr超能文献

Pain of injection and duration of anesthesia for intradermal infiltration of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine.

作者信息

Howe N R, Williams J M

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102.

出版信息

J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994 Jul;20(7):459-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb03216.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bupivacaine and etidocaine are local anesthetics said to be long acting based on nerve block data. There are insufficient data on pain of infiltration and duration of anesthesia when either is used for dermal infiltration to assess suitability for skin surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded comparison of intradermal 1% etidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, and 2% lidocaine for pain of injection and duration of anesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty subjects received the above three agents plus normal saline, each with and without epinephrine 1:200,000, with all solutions adjusted to pH 5.95 +/- 0.15.

RESULTS

Lidocaine hurt least and etidocaine hurt most. Adrenalized solutions were more painful than plain. For plain solutions bupivacaine lasted longest and lidocaine lasted shortest by far. For adrenalized solutions bupivacaine lasted 27% longer than lidocaine and 45% longer than etidocaine.

CONCLUSION

Where epinephrine is contraindicated and long anesthesia matters, use plain bupivacaine. When epinephrine can be used, lidocaine lasts almost as long as bupivacaine and hurts less.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验