Suppr超能文献

Pain of injection and duration of anesthesia for intradermal infiltration of lidocaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine.

作者信息

Howe N R, Williams J M

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102.

出版信息

J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1994 Jul;20(7):459-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1994.tb03216.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bupivacaine and etidocaine are local anesthetics said to be long acting based on nerve block data. There are insufficient data on pain of infiltration and duration of anesthesia when either is used for dermal infiltration to assess suitability for skin surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded comparison of intradermal 1% etidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine, and 2% lidocaine for pain of injection and duration of anesthesia.

METHODS

Twenty subjects received the above three agents plus normal saline, each with and without epinephrine 1:200,000, with all solutions adjusted to pH 5.95 +/- 0.15.

RESULTS

Lidocaine hurt least and etidocaine hurt most. Adrenalized solutions were more painful than plain. For plain solutions bupivacaine lasted longest and lidocaine lasted shortest by far. For adrenalized solutions bupivacaine lasted 27% longer than lidocaine and 45% longer than etidocaine.

CONCLUSION

Where epinephrine is contraindicated and long anesthesia matters, use plain bupivacaine. When epinephrine can be used, lidocaine lasts almost as long as bupivacaine and hurts less.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验