Hansen N C, Evald T, Ibsen T B
Department of Respiratory Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.
Respir Med. 1994 Apr;88(4):267-71. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(94)90055-8.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are often treated with high dose inhalations of beta 2-agonists. We compared domiciliary therapy with terbutaline administered by the Turbuhaler and by a jet nebulizer. Forty nebulizer users with severe COPD were included in the randomized, double-blind, cross-over study. Terbutaline was inhaled t.i.d. for 2 weeks as dry powder (5 doses = 2.5 mg) by Turbuhaler or as solution (2 ml = 5 mg) by jet nebulizer (Pari Inhalierboy). The mean age of the 25 completing patients was 66 years (range: 54-81), the mean FEV1 was 0.73 l or 29% of predicted (range: 11-55%). The period where the Turbuhaler delivered the active drug was preferred by 16 patients, the nebulizer period by seven (P = 0.09). The median score concerning feeling of control over the disease--according to the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire--was better after the Turbuhaler period (P = 0.01). Other scores concerning disease related quality of life, the daily peak expiratory flow rates, the additional use of a metered dose inhaler were not significantly different for the two types of treatment. It is concluded that high dose domiciliary terbutaline treatment by Turbuhaler can replace nebulizer treatment in most patients with severe COPD.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者常接受高剂量β2受体激动剂吸入治疗。我们比较了使用都保装置和喷射雾化器在家中使用特布他林的治疗效果。40名重度COPD雾化器使用者纳入了这项随机、双盲、交叉研究。特布他林以干粉形式(5剂 = 2.5毫克)通过都保装置每日吸入3次,持续2周,或以溶液形式(2毫升 = 5毫克)通过喷射雾化器(百瑞雾化器)吸入。25名完成研究的患者平均年龄为66岁(范围:54 - 81岁),平均第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)为0.73升,占预计值的29%(范围:11% - 55%)。16名患者更倾向于都保装置输送活性药物的阶段,7名患者更倾向于雾化器阶段(P = 0.09)。根据慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷,在都保装置阶段后,关于疾病控制感的中位数评分更好(P = 0.01)。关于疾病相关生活质量、每日呼气峰值流速、定量吸入器额外使用情况的其他评分,两种治疗类型之间无显著差异。得出的结论是,对于大多数重度COPD患者,使用都保装置在家中进行高剂量特布他林治疗可替代雾化器治疗。