Deber R B
Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Ont.
CMAJ. 1994 Jul 15;151(2):171-6.
Historical views of the patient-physician relationship assumed that the physician's role was to act in the best interests of the patient and to direct care and make decisions about treatment on the patient's behalf. However, under current legal and ethical principles, beneficence is no longer sufficient; respect for autonomy is paramount, necessitating patient participation. None the less, physicians question whether patient participation is realistic in actual clinical situations. This first of two articles reviews models of the patient-physician relationship and the literature about barriers to participation, the effect of participation on patient outcome and the extent to which patients want to be informed. The image of a dependent patient who prefers to be sheltered from harsh truths is not supported. It appears that most patients wish to have information, although there is an identifiable proportion who do not. To be understood, health information must be presented in a way that is appropriate to the patient. Format, content and timing of the material are all important. Mechanisms for incorporating such information into busy clinical practices are crucial.
对医患关系的历史观点认为,医生的角色是为患者的最大利益行事,并代表患者指导护理和做出治疗决策。然而,根据当前的法律和伦理原则,行善已不再足够;尊重自主权至关重要,这就需要患者的参与。尽管如此,医生们质疑患者参与在实际临床情况下是否现实。这两篇文章中的第一篇回顾了医患关系的模式以及关于参与障碍、参与对患者结果的影响以及患者希望了解信息的程度的文献。依赖型患者宁愿避开残酷真相的形象并不成立。似乎大多数患者希望获得信息,尽管有一部分人确实不想。为了让患者理解,健康信息必须以适合患者的方式呈现。材料的形式、内容和时机都很重要。将此类信息纳入繁忙临床实践的机制至关重要。