• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.医疗保健管理中的医生:8. 医患伙伴关系:决策、问题解决与参与意愿。
CMAJ. 1994 Aug 15;151(4):423-7.
2
Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information.医疗保健管理中的医生:7. 医患伙伴关系:角色转变与信息需求
CMAJ. 1994 Jul 15;151(2):171-6.
3
[Shared decision making: an approach to strengthening patient participation in rehabilitation].[共同决策:增强患者参与康复的一种方法]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Jun;42(3):129-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40097.
4
Health decisions and decision support for women.女性的健康决策与决策支持
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2001;19:307-24.
5
Shared decision making in critical care: a clinical reality and an ethical necessity.重症监护中的共同决策:临床现实与伦理必然要求。
Am J Crit Care. 1996 Nov;5(6):391-6.
6
Measuring shared decision making in the consultation: a comparison of the OPTION and Informed Decision Making instruments.衡量会诊中的共同决策:OPTION 工具与知情决策工具的比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jan;70(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
7
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
8
Physician-patient relations: no more models.医患关系:不再有模式。
Am J Bioeth. 2004 Spring;4(2):W16-9. doi: 10.1162/152651604323097934.
9
Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions.超越共同决策:医学决策的扩展类型学
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):699-705. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318465. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
10
What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?患者希望在治疗决策中扮演什么角色?
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 8;156(13):1414-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitating active participation in anticoagulant decisions in advanced kidney disease: co-production of a question prompt list.促进晚期肾病患者积极参与抗凝决策:共同制定问题提示清单
BMC Nephrol. 2025 Jan 28;26(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12882-025-03966-y.
2
For Whom the Note Scrolls: A Brief History of the Medical Record's Role in Education and the Risks It Faces in the Age of OpenNotes.病历为谁而滚动:病历在教育中的作用简史及其在开放病历时代所面临的风险
Neurol Educ. 2024 Sep 9;3(3):e200147. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200147. eCollection 2024 Sep 25.
3
Correlates of Control Preferences, Participation in Decision-making and Activation in Patients with Substance Use Disorder.物质使用障碍患者控制偏好、参与决策和激活的相关因素。
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Jun;52(3):192-203. doi: 10.62641/aep.v52i3.1598.
4
Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯语慢性病患者对共同决策的偏好:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 11;12(4):e058084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058084.
5
Shared Decision-making in Different Types of Decisions in Medical Specialist Consultations.医学专家会诊中不同类型决策的共享决策。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):2966-2972. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07221-6. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
6
Contributory factors to the evolution of the concept and practice of informed consent in clinical research: A narrative review.临床研究中知情同意概念与实践演变的促成因素:一项叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100634. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100634. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Development of a program theory for shared decision-making: a realist synthesis.制定共享决策的方案理论:一个现实主义综合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 23;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4649-1.
8
The role of multidisciplinary decision making in oropharyngeal cancer: do we follow guidelines and are treatment decisions being implemented?多学科决策在口咽癌中的作用:我们是否遵循指南,治疗决策是否得到实施?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar;277(3):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s00405-019-05781-2. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
9
Preferred problem solving and decision-making role in fertility treatment among women following an unsuccessful in vitro fertilization cycle.在体外受精周期失败后,女性在生育治疗中更倾向于解决问题和做决策的角色。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0856-5.
10
Patient's Desire and Preference for Provision of Information Toward Greater Involvement in Shared Care.患者对获取信息以更多参与共同照护的意愿和偏好。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2016 Sep-Dec;4(3):172-177. doi: 10.4103/1658-631X.188266. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information.医疗保健管理中的医生:7. 医患伙伴关系:角色转变与信息需求
CMAJ. 1994 Jul 15;151(2):171-6.
2
Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.癌症患者的信息与参与偏好。
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jun;92(6):832-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832.
3
Adding insult to injury. Usurping patients' prerogatives.雪上加霜。侵犯患者权利。
N Engl J Med. 1983 Apr 14;308(15):898-901. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198304143081511.
4
Barriers to informed consent.知情同意的障碍。
Ann Intern Med. 1983 Oct;99(4):539-43. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-99-4-539.
5
Patient understanding and satisfaction as predictors of compliance.患者的理解和满意度作为依从性的预测指标。
Med Care. 1983 Sep;21(9):886-91. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198309000-00005.
6
Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?患者是否希望参与医疗决策?
JAMA. 1984 Dec 7;252(21):2990-4.
7
Paternalism modernised.现代化的家长式作风。
J Med Ethics. 1985 Dec;11(4):184-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184.
8
Preferences for treatment control among adults with cancer.癌症成年患者对治疗控制的偏好。
Res Nurs Health. 1988 Dec;11(6):367-74. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770110604.
9
Information and decision-making preferences of hospitalized adult cancer patients.住院成年癌症患者的信息及决策偏好
Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(11):1139-45. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90343-7.
10
Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.癌症患者:他们对信息的需求以及参与治疗决策的情况。
J R Soc Med. 1989 May;82(5):260-3. doi: 10.1177/014107688908200506.

医疗保健管理中的医生:8. 医患伙伴关系:决策、问题解决与参与意愿。

Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

作者信息

Deber R B

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ. 1994 Aug 15;151(4):423-7.

PMID:8055402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1337094/
Abstract

How reasonable are expectations that patients will participate in care decisions? The previous article in this series reviewed models of the patient-physician relationship and views on the extent to which patients want to be informed; it also described one information tool--the interactive videodisc. This article reviews literature on the extent to which patients wish to be involved in making decisions about their care. Neither "sensitive paternalism" nor "informed consent" appears to be ideal. The author suggests a distinction between two elements of choice: problem solving and decision making. This distinction helps in identifying appropriate roles for patient and provider, thereby leading to genuine shared decision making.

摘要

期望患者参与医疗决策的合理性究竟如何?本系列的上一篇文章回顾了医患关系的模式以及关于患者希望了解信息程度的观点;还介绍了一种信息工具——交互式录像光盘。本文回顾了有关患者希望参与其医疗决策程度的文献。“敏感家长式作风”和“知情同意”似乎都不理想。作者建议区分选择的两个要素:解决问题和决策。这种区分有助于确定患者和医疗服务提供者的适当角色,从而实现真正的共同决策。