Steinberg L, Lamborn S D, Darling N, Mounts N S, Dornbusch S M
Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122.
Child Dev. 1994 Jun;65(3):754-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00781.x.
In a previous report, we demonstrated that adolescents' adjustment varies as a function of their parents' style (e.g., authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, neglectful). This 1-year follow-up was conducted in order to examine whether the observed differences are maintained over time. In 1987, an ethnically and socioeconomically heterogeneous sample of approximately 2,300 14-18-year-olds provided information used to classify the adolescents' families into 1 of 4 parenting style groups. That year, and again 1 year later, the students completed a battery of standardized instruments tapping psychosocial development, school achievement, internalized distress, and behavior problems. Differences in adjustment associated with variations in parenting are either maintained or increase over time. However, whereas the benefits of authoritative parenting are largely in the maintenance of previous levels of high adjustment, the deleterious consequences of neglectful parenting continue to accumulate.
在之前的一份报告中,我们证明了青少年的适应情况会因其父母的教养方式(如权威型、专制型、放任型、忽视型)而有所不同。此次为期一年的随访旨在检验观察到的差异是否会随时间持续存在。1987年,我们选取了一个种族和社会经济背景各异的样本,其中约2300名14至18岁的青少年提供了相关信息,这些信息用于将青少年家庭分为四种教养方式组中的一种。当年以及一年后,学生们完成了一系列标准化测评,涉及心理社会发展、学业成绩、内化困扰和行为问题。与教养方式差异相关的适应情况差异会随时间持续存在或加大。然而,权威型教养方式的益处主要在于维持先前较高的适应水平,而忽视型教养方式的有害后果则会持续累积。