Murray R, Eddy D E, Bartoli W P, Paul G L
Exercise Physiology Laboratory, Gatorade Sports Science Institute, Barrington, IL 60010.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Jun;26(6):725-32. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199406000-00012.
This study assessed the gastric emptying rates of water and four isocaloric carbohydrate solutions in resting subjects. On five occasions, subjects ingested 400 ml of water or 6% solutions of glucose, sucrose, maltodextrin, and sucrose+glucose. The double-sampling technique was used to sample stomach contents immediately after ingestion and at 10-min intervals until emptying was complete. Comparisons of various criteria of gastric emptying (percentage of initial beverage volume remaining in the stomach, mean gastric emptying rates, and gross gastric volumes) provided somewhat different results. For example, when gastric emptying was portrayed as the percentage of initial beverage volume remaining in the stomach, the glucose and maltodextrin beverages exhibited significantly slower emptying characteristics; there were no differences in this measure among water, sucrose, and sucrose+glucose. Similar results were noted when changes in gross gastric volumes were compared. However, when the results are expressed as mean gastric emptying rates (in ml.min-1), few differences are noted among beverage treatments. Gastric emptying rate was not influenced by the osmolality of the ingested solutions. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of using more than one measurement criteria to assess and compare gastric emptying characteristics.
本研究评估了静息状态下受试者对水和四种等热量碳水化合物溶液的胃排空率。受试者在五个不同时段分别摄入400毫升水或葡萄糖、蔗糖、麦芽糊精以及蔗糖+葡萄糖的6%溶液。采用双样本技术,在摄入后立即以及之后每隔10分钟采集胃内容物样本,直至排空完成。对胃排空的各种标准(胃内剩余初始饮料体积的百分比、平均胃排空率和胃总体积)进行比较得出了略有不同的结果。例如,当将胃排空描述为胃内剩余初始饮料体积的百分比时,葡萄糖和麦芽糊精饮料的排空特征明显较慢;在水、蔗糖和蔗糖+葡萄糖之间,该指标没有差异。比较胃总体积变化时也观察到类似结果。然而,当结果以平均胃排空率(毫升·分钟⁻¹)表示时,不同饮料处理之间几乎没有差异。胃排空率不受摄入溶液渗透压的影响。本研究结果表明,使用多种测量标准来评估和比较胃排空特征非常重要。