Suppr超能文献

使用单能和双能吸收测定法测量桡骨骨密度。

Densitometry of the radius using single and dual energy absorptiometry.

作者信息

Faulkner K G, McClung M R, Schmeer M S, Roberts L A, Gaither K W

机构信息

Providence Center for Osteoporosis Research, Portland, Oregon 97213-2966.

出版信息

Calcif Tissue Int. 1994 Mar;54(3):208-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00301680.

Abstract

Though spinal and femoral measurements are typically preferred for evaluating skeletal density, an abundance of forearm data exists, primarily from single photon absorptiometry (SPA) devices. Most dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners are capable of scanning the forearm and provide analysis tools to duplicate conventional SPA measurements. In this study, we have compared the radius density measurements from three commonly available densitometers: a Norland 278 SPA, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic 1000/W. Radius bone mineral density (BMD) on the nondominant forearm was measured in 28 volunteers (21 women and 7 men) aged 24-78, with an average age of 51 +/- 17 years. Values were compared and regression relationships derived at corresponding measurement sites. SPA and DXA BMD values were found to be highly correlated (r = 0.99) with small standard errors (0.014 g/cm2-0.021 g/cm2), though significant absolute differences were observed at most measurement regions. Correlation slopes ranged from 0.85 to 1.04, with intercepts from 0.01 to 0.08 g/cm2. Using the resultant regression equations, SPA BMD values can be converted to DXA values with an expected error of roughly 3%. DXA BMD can also be interconverted between Lunar and Hologic with a similar expected error. In situations where this level of imprecision is acceptable, patient forearm measurements obtained on different systems can be interconverted.

摘要

虽然评估骨骼密度通常首选脊柱和股骨测量,但也存在大量前臂数据,主要来自单光子吸收测定法(SPA)设备。大多数双能X线吸收测定法(DXA)扫描仪都能够扫描前臂,并提供分析工具以重复传统的SPA测量。在本研究中,我们比较了三种常用骨密度仪测量的桡骨密度:一台Norland 278 SPA、一台Lunar DPX-L和一台Hologic 1000/W。对28名年龄在24至78岁(平均年龄51±17岁)的志愿者(21名女性和7名男性)的非优势前臂进行了桡骨骨矿物质密度(BMD)测量。比较了相应测量部位的数值并得出回归关系。发现SPA和DXA的BMD值高度相关(r = 0.99),标准误差较小(0.014 g/cm² - 0.021 g/cm²),不过在大多数测量区域观察到了显著的绝对差异。相关斜率范围为0.85至1.04,截距为0.01至0.08 g/cm²。使用所得的回归方程,SPA的BMD值可以转换为DXA值,预期误差约为3%。DXA的BMD值在Lunar和Hologic之间也可以进行类似的相互转换,预期误差相似。在这种不精确程度可接受的情况下,在不同系统上获得的患者前臂测量值可以相互转换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验