Lloyd J J, James J M, Shields R A, Testa H J
Department of Medical Physics, Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1994 May;21(5):394-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00171413.
The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of inhalation technique on Technegas image quality and on fractional particle deposition. This was investigated in six normal volunteers using three different types of breathing pattern. Fractional deposition was determined by analysis of dynamic gamma camera images acquired during Technegas administration. Static lung images were subsequently acquired and assessed independently by three experienced observers. High-quality images were obtained in all cases although slight differences were noted. The images produced using a slow deep inspiration with a breath hold (i.e. the standard method) were of more uniform texture and also had the least gradient in activity from apex to base. The converse was true for a rapid inhalation technique. The average fractional deposition per breath was 55%, but this varied between individuals and with breathing pattern, being most influenced by the total duration of a breath. We conclude that for patient studies the standard inhalation technique is best, although variation to suit individual patients would be acceptable. These results contrast with similar studies using conventional radio-aerosols, which tend to show a greater sensitivity of image appearance to changes in breathing pattern and lower fractional depositions.
