Wise R, Andrews J M
Department of Microbiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994 May;38(5):1096-102. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.5.1096.
The in vitro activities of two glycylcyclines, CL 329,998 and CL 331,002 (two new semisynthetic tetracyclines), were evaluated in comparison with those of tetracycline and other available oral antimicrobial agents. A total of 523 recent clinical isolates were studied, including strains resistant to tetracycline. Members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were generally > or = 16-fold more susceptible to the glycylcyclines than to tetracycline (although less difference was seen with Proteus spp.). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was modestly susceptible to both new compounds (MIC for 90% of strains tested [MIC90], 16 micrograms/ml). Tetracycline- and methicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus were all susceptible to the glycylcyclines (MIC90 < or = 1 microgram/ml). Streptococci (including Streptococcus pneumoniae) and Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium displayed a bimodal distribution of susceptibility to tetracycline yet were uniformly susceptible to the glycylcyclines (MIC90 < or = 0.25 microgram/ml). The glycylcyclines were highly potent against Neisseria, Moraxella, Haemophilus, and Bacteroides spp. (MIC90 < or = 0.5 microgram/ml). Strains of Chlamydia spp. (three C. trachomatis strains and one C. pneumoniae strain) were inhibited by < or = 0.25 microgram of CL 329,998 or CL 331,002 per ml. Two strains of Mycoplasma pneumoniae were inhibited by < or = 0.12 microgram of CL 331,002 per ml and by 1 microgram of CL 329,998 per ml. Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium were resistant to the two glycylcyclines (MIC > or = 8 micrograms/ml). These results indicate that the two glycylcyclines have potent in vitro activities against a wide range of clinically important pathogenic bacteria.
对两种甘氨酰环素(CL 329,998和CL 331,002,两种新型半合成四环素)的体外活性进行了评估,并与四环素及其他可用的口服抗菌剂进行比较。共研究了523株近期临床分离株,包括对四环素耐药的菌株。肠杆菌科成员对甘氨酰环素的敏感性通常比对四环素高16倍或更高(尽管变形杆菌属的差异较小)。铜绿假单胞菌对这两种新化合物的敏感性适中(90%受试菌株的最低抑菌浓度[MIC90]为16微克/毫升)。四环素敏感及耐药的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株对甘氨酰环素均敏感(MIC90≤1微克/毫升)。链球菌(包括肺炎链球菌)、粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌对四环素的敏感性呈双峰分布,但对甘氨酰环素均敏感(MIC90≤0.25微克/毫升)。甘氨酰环素对奈瑟菌属、莫拉菌属、嗜血杆菌属和拟杆菌属具有高效活性(MIC90≤0.5微克/毫升)。衣原体属菌株(3株沙眼衣原体菌株和1株肺炎衣原体菌株)每毫升被≤0.25微克的CL 329,998或CL 331,002抑制。两株肺炎支原体菌株每毫升被≤0.12微克的CL 331,002和1微克的CL 329,998抑制。结核分枝杆菌和鸟分枝杆菌对这两种甘氨酰环素耐药(MIC≥8微克/毫升)。这些结果表明,这两种甘氨酰环素对多种临床上重要的病原菌具有强大的体外活性。