• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何评估癌症患者的思维能力。

How to assess thinking skills in cancer patients.

作者信息

Nelson-Jones R, Cosolo W

机构信息

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 1994;8(2):115-21. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800204.

DOI:10.1177/026921639400800204
PMID:8081552
Abstract

This article emphasizes the importance of health care professionals assessing and working with the way cancer patients think. Health care professionals can help cancer patients think more effectively about the organic manifestations of their disease, problems that arise from the cancer experience, and problems unrelated to cancer, but which negatively influence their lives. Nine thinking skills areas are identified and described. Skills that health care professionals can use to assess patients' thinking, and to gain insight into their own thinking, are reviewed. In addition, suggestions are made for how patients can be helped to overcome thinking skills weaknesses and build their strengths so that they can optimize their chances of quality life.

摘要

本文强调了医疗保健专业人员评估癌症患者的思维方式并与之合作的重要性。医疗保健专业人员可以帮助癌症患者更有效地思考其疾病的器质性表现、癌症经历所引发的问题,以及与癌症无关但对其生活产生负面影响的问题。文中确定并描述了九个思维技能领域。回顾了医疗保健专业人员可用于评估患者思维并深入了解自身思维的技能。此外,还就如何帮助患者克服思维技能弱点并培养优势,以便他们能够优化获得优质生活的机会提出了建议。

相似文献

1
How to assess thinking skills in cancer patients.如何评估癌症患者的思维能力。
Palliat Med. 1994;8(2):115-21. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800204.
2
Breaking bad news--a flow diagram.告知坏消息——流程图
Palliat Med. 1994;8(2):145-51. doi: 10.1177/026921639400800208.
3
Which cancer patients benefit most from a brief, group, coping skills program?哪些癌症患者能从简短的团体应对技能项目中获益最多?
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1993;23(4):383-98. doi: 10.2190/EQ7N-2UFR-EBHJ-QW4P.
4
A relational perspective of women coping with cancer: a preliminary study.
Soc Work Health Care. 1997;25(1-2):89-106. doi: 10.1300/J010v25n01_10.
5
Positive illusions and coping with adversity.积极错觉与应对逆境。
J Pers. 1996 Dec;64(4):873-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00947.x.
6
[Medical consultation with curable cancer patients].
HNO. 1996 Nov;44(11):645-54.
7
Psychosocial factors in cancer.癌症中的社会心理因素
Am Fam Physician. 1981 Feb;23(2):197-201.
8
Project Genesis: assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients.创世纪项目:评估问题解决疗法对成年癌症患者的疗效。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):1036-48. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.1036.
9
Critical thinking a new approach to patient care.批判性思维:一种全新的患者护理方法。
JEMS. 2010 Apr;35(4):48-53. doi: 10.1016/S0197-2510(10)70094-2.
10
Defensive pessimism, optimism, and simulating alternatives: some ups and downs of prefactual and counterfactual thinking.防御性悲观、乐观以及模拟替代方案:事前与反事实思维的一些起伏
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Nov;71(5):1020-36. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.1020.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' beliefs about cancer management.患者对癌症治疗的看法。
Support Care Cancer. 1996 Mar;4(2):110-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01845760.