Sanders M H, Kern N B, Stiller R A, Strollo P J, Martin T J, Atwood C W
Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA.
Chest. 1994 Sep;106(3):774-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.3.774.
To determine the effectiveness of oronasal masks for positive pressure therapy in alleviating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Polysomnographic records of all 245 patients with OSA who underwent therapeutic trials of either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure between January 1991 and December 1992 were reviewed. Thirty patients who had been prescribed positive pressure therapy employing an oronasal mask were identified. Two patients known to be successfully treated with CPAP via oronasal mask underwent repeat polysomnography. The initial portion of the study was a diagnostic evaluation during which the patients were untreated. During the second portion of the study, both patients used CPAP via an oronasal mask while wearing a mouthpiece designed to maintain oral patency.
The 30 patients with OSA who were identified in this study had significant amelioration of OSA while receiving positive pressure therapy via oronasal mask compared with the baseline, diagnostic polysomnogram (apnea index: 55.3 +/- 36.9-->1.6 +/- 3.7, p < 0.001; hypopnea index: 21.2 +/- 20-->2.7 +/- 4.9, p < 0.001; nadir of SaO2: 72.5 +/- 13.9-->87.1 +/- 4.3, p < 0.001, mean +/- SD). Improvement of OSA did not depend on maintenance of a closed mouth, as evidenced by elimination of sleep-disordered breathing in the two patients receiving positive pressure via oronasal mask while wearing a mouthpiece to keep the mouth open.
Oronasal masks are a viable alternative interface for alleviating OSA with positive pressure therapy in those patients who are unwilling or unable to tolerate conventional nasal interfaces. Although there were no adverse consequences associated with the use of oronasal masks in our patients, appropriate safety precautions should be taken to minimize the possibility of aspiration of gastric contents and avoid untoward sequelae due to positive pressure device failure.
确定口鼻面罩在正压通气治疗中缓解阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的有效性。
回顾了1991年1月至1992年12月期间接受持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或双水平气道正压通气治疗试验的所有245例OSA患者的多导睡眠图记录。确定了30例采用口鼻面罩进行正压通气治疗的患者。已知通过口鼻面罩接受CPAP成功治疗的2例患者接受了重复多导睡眠图检查。研究的第一部分是诊断评估,在此期间患者未接受治疗。在研究的第二部分,两名患者在佩戴旨在保持口腔通畅的咬嘴时,通过口鼻面罩使用CPAP。
与基线诊断性多导睡眠图相比,本研究中确定的30例OSA患者在通过口鼻面罩接受正压通气治疗时,OSA有显著改善(呼吸暂停指数:55.3±36.9→1.6±3.7,p<0.001;呼吸浅慢指数:21.2±20→2.7±4.9,p<0.001;血氧饱和度最低点:72.5±13.9→87.1±4.3,p<0.001,均值±标准差)。OSA的改善并不取决于保持嘴巴闭合,这在两名佩戴咬嘴使嘴巴张开并通过口鼻面罩接受正压通气的患者中睡眠呼吸紊乱的消除得到了证明。
对于那些不愿意或无法耐受传统鼻面罩的患者,口鼻面罩是通过正压通气治疗缓解OSA的一种可行替代接口。虽然在我们的患者中使用口鼻面罩没有不良后果,但应采取适当的安全措施,以尽量减少胃内容物误吸的可能性,并避免因正压设备故障导致的不良后果。