Suppr超能文献

使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》分离性障碍结构化临床访谈来区分多重人格障碍(分离性身份障碍)和精神分裂症。

Distinguishing between multiple personality disorder (dissociative identity disorder) and schizophrenia using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders.

作者信息

Steinberg M, Cicchetti D, Buchanan J, Rakfeldt J, Rounsaville B

机构信息

Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Sep;182(9):495-502. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199409000-00004.

Abstract

The authors describe the systematic assessment of dissociative symptoms using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders (SCID-D) in 50 psychiatric outpatients with a referring DSM-III-R diagnosis of either schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (N = 31) and subjects with multiple personality disorder (MPD [DSM-IV name change: dissociative identity disorder]; N = 19). Results indicate that patients with MPD experience significantly higher scores for five specific dissociative symptoms than patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. The range, severity, and nature of the five dissociative symptom areas evaluated by the SCID-D distinguish MPD from the occasional occurrence of dissociative symptoms which may be seen in schizophrenia. Systematic assessment of dissociative symptoms using the SCID-D can assist in accurate differential diagnosis of MPD and schizophrenia.

摘要

作者描述了使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版解离性障碍结构化临床访谈》(SCID-D)对50名精神科门诊患者进行的解离症状系统评估。这些患者中,31名被转诊诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍(依据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第三版修订版》),19名被诊断为多重人格障碍(MPD,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》中名称变更为解离性身份障碍)。结果表明,与精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者相比,多重人格障碍患者在五种特定解离症状上的得分显著更高。SCID-D评估的五个解离症状领域的范围、严重程度和性质,将多重人格障碍与精神分裂症中偶尔出现的解离症状区分开来。使用SCID-D对解离症状进行系统评估有助于准确鉴别多重人格障碍和精神分裂症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验