• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较颜色-单词和图片-单词类斯特鲁普效应:对格拉泽和格拉泽(1989年)模型的一项测试。

Comparing color-word and picture-word Stroop-like effects: a test of the Glaser and Glaser (1989) model.

作者信息

De Houwer J, Fias W, d'Ydewalle G

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 1994;56(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/BF00419659.

DOI:10.1007/BF00419659
PMID:8090863
Abstract

Glaser and Glaser (1989) assume that the processing of colors and pictures is highly similar in that, compared to words, both kinds of stimulis have privileged access to semantic information. This assumption was tested in the present research. In Experiment 1, the season corresponding to the color or to the word of color-word Stroop stimuli had to be named (e.g., green for spring). In Experiment 2, subjects had to name the season corresponding to the picture or the word of a picture-word stimulus (e.g., flower for spring). According to Glaser and Glaser (1989), privileged semantic processing of colors and pictures should be evidenced by a larger interfering power of color and picture distractors than of word distractors. However, the asymmetric pattern of interference was observed only with picture-word stimuli (Experiment 2), but not with color-word stimuli (Experiment 1), suggesting that, unlike pictures, colors do not have privileged access to semantic information. It was also found that word distractors interfered with the semantic processing of pictures, a result that is incompatible with the dominance rule postulated by Glaser and Glaser (1989). From these results, an adapted version of the Glaser and Glaser model is proposed: colors are assumed to have privileged access to a separate color-processing system and the pattern of interference depends upon the relative activation strength of the response alternatives activated by the target and the distractor.

摘要

格拉泽和格拉泽(1989)认为,颜色和图片的处理方式高度相似,因为与单词相比,这两种刺激都能更优先地获取语义信息。本研究对这一假设进行了检验。在实验1中,需要说出与颜色-单词斯特鲁普刺激中的颜色或单词相对应的季节(例如,绿色对应春天)。在实验2中,受试者必须说出与图片-单词刺激中的图片或单词相对应的季节(例如,花朵对应春天)。根据格拉泽和格拉泽(1989)的观点,颜色和图片的优先语义处理应表现为颜色和图片干扰项的干扰力大于单词干扰项。然而,仅在图片-单词刺激(实验2)中观察到了不对称的干扰模式,而在颜色-单词刺激(实验1)中未观察到,这表明与图片不同,颜色无法优先获取语义信息。研究还发现,单词干扰项会干扰图片的语义处理,这一结果与格拉泽和格拉泽(1989)提出的优势规则不相符。基于这些结果,提出了格拉泽和格拉泽模型的一个改进版本:假设颜色能够优先进入一个独立的颜色处理系统,干扰模式取决于目标和干扰项激活的反应选项的相对激活强度。

相似文献

1
Comparing color-word and picture-word Stroop-like effects: a test of the Glaser and Glaser (1989) model.比较颜色-单词和图片-单词类斯特鲁普效应:对格拉泽和格拉泽(1989年)模型的一项测试。
Psychol Res. 1994;56(4):293-300. doi: 10.1007/BF00419659.
2
Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.类似斯特鲁普效应的文字与图片处理中的情境效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Mar;118(1):13-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.1.13.
3
Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.追踪图片-文字处理的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373.
4
Semantic component of a cross-modal Stroop-like task.一种跨模态类斯特鲁普任务的语义成分。
Am J Psychol. 1993 Fall;106(3):383-405.
5
Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.与显性命名中语义和 Stroop 样干扰效应相关的事件相关电位和振荡脑反应。
Brain Res. 2012 Apr 23;1450:87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.050. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.关于图片-单词干扰范式中语义干扰效应的类别性质。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Feb;12(1):125-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196357.
7
Facilitation and interference effects in a Stroop-like task: evidence in favor of semantic processing of parafoveally-presented stimuli.类斯特鲁普任务中的促进和干扰效应:支持对副中央凹呈现刺激进行语义加工的证据。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1993 Dec;84(3):213-29. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90061-u.
8
[The role of semantic attributes of the distractor word in the script type effect on the Stroop color-word interference task].[干扰词的语义属性在脚本类型对斯特鲁普颜色-词干扰任务的影响中的作用]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1988 Apr;59(1):1-8. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.59.1.
9
Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.单词命名会减慢图片命名的速度,但不影响累积语义干扰。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Apr;195:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Task choice and semantic interference in picture naming.图片命名中的任务选择与语义干扰
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 May;157:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer's disease and its related factors in a memory clinic setting, Shanghai, China.中国上海一家记忆门诊中阿尔茨海默病患者的认知衰退及其相关因素
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 21;9(4):e95755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095755. eCollection 2014.
2
Color perception involves color representations firstly at a semantic level and then at a lexical level.颜色感知首先涉及语义层面的颜色表征,然后是词汇层面的颜色表征。
Cogn Process. 2013 Mar;14(1):19-29. doi: 10.1007/s10339-012-0527-z. Epub 2012 Sep 29.
3
Seeing red primes tomato: evidence for comparable priming from colour and colour name primes to semantically related word targets.

本文引用的文献

1
Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.斯特鲁普范式和西蒙范式中的干扰效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Aug;19(4):830-44. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.830.
2
A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.一套标准化的260张图片:名称一致性、图像一致性、熟悉度和视觉复杂度的规范。
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.6.2.174.
3
The effects of priming on picture recognition.启动对图片识别的影响。
看到红色会启动对西红柿的联想:从颜色和颜色名称启动到语义相关单词目标的可比启动证据。
Cogn Process. 2006 Dec;7(4):269-74. doi: 10.1007/s10339-006-0153-8. Epub 2006 Sep 26.
Br J Psychol. 1982 Feb;73(Pt 1):117-29. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1982.tb01796.x.
4
The time course of picture-word interference.图词干扰的时间进程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):640-54. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.5.640.
5
Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.
Mem Cognit. 1985 Jul;13(4):304-19. doi: 10.3758/bf03202499.
6
Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1985 Jul;11(3):579-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.11.3.579.
7
Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.类似斯特鲁普效应的文字与图片处理中的情境效应
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Mar;118(1):13-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.118.1.13.
8
On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.论自动加工过程的控制:对斯特鲁普效应的并行分布式加工解释
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.332.
9
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review.对斯特鲁普效应的半个世纪研究:一项综合综述。
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163.
10
Picture naming.图片命名
Cognition. 1992 Mar;42(1-3):61-105. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90040-o.