Lewis K S, Whipple J K, Michael K A, Quebbeman E J
College of Pharmacy, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans 70125.
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1994 Jun 15;51(12):1539-54.
Physiological responses to acute pain are described, and the effects of different analgesic techniques on these responses are discussed. The body's response to acute pain can cause adverse physiological effects. Pain can impede the return of normal pulmonary function, modify certain aspects of the stress response to injury, and alter hemodynamic values and cardiovascular function. It can produce immobility and contribute to thromboembolic complications. In addition, pain can slow a patient's recovery from surgery and contribute to increased morbidity. Fewer pulmonary complications occur when adequate analgesia is provided through the use of epidural narcotics and local anesthetics, particularly if the injury or surgery involves the lower part of the body. Continuous morphine infusions, intercostal nerve blocks, and transcutaneous electrical stimulation do not alter the frequency of pulmonary complications. The effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications is still not known. Epidural local anesthetic therapy inhibits the stress response, particularly in operations involving the lower abdomen or extremities; this technique is less effective during major abdominal procedures. Suppression of endocrine-metabolic changes following lower abdominal surgery requires neural block to the fourth thoracic segment. Epidural narcotics partially inhibit the stress response after lower abdominal or extremity surgery but not after upper abdominal or thoracic surgery. Local anesthetics applied to the surgical site, intercostal nerve blocks, and intrapleural and intraperitoneal administration also do not modify the stress response. Adequate analgesia through the use of local anesthetics and narcotics postoperatively generally results in improved cardiovascular function, decreased pulmonary morbidity and mortality, earlier ambulation, and decreased likelihood of deep vein thrombosis. Some data suggest that improved patient outcome occurs with adequate analgesia. Block of afferent and efferent neural pathways by local anesthetics seems to be the most effective analgesic modality in lessening the physiologic response to pain and injury.
本文描述了对急性疼痛的生理反应,并讨论了不同镇痛技术对这些反应的影响。身体对急性疼痛的反应可能会导致不良的生理影响。疼痛会阻碍正常肺功能的恢复,改变对损伤的应激反应的某些方面,并改变血流动力学值和心血管功能。它会导致活动受限,并增加血栓栓塞并发症的风险。此外,疼痛会延缓患者术后的恢复,并增加发病率。通过使用硬膜外麻醉药和局部麻醉剂提供充分的镇痛时,肺部并发症会减少,尤其是当损伤或手术涉及身体下部时。持续输注吗啡、肋间神经阻滞和经皮电刺激不会改变肺部并发症的发生率。患者自控镇痛在减少术后肺部并发症方面的有效性尚不清楚。硬膜外局部麻醉疗法可抑制应激反应,尤其是在涉及下腹部或四肢的手术中;在大型腹部手术中,这种技术的效果较差。下腹部手术后,抑制内分泌代谢变化需要将神经阻滞至胸4节段。硬膜外麻醉药在下腹部或四肢手术后可部分抑制应激反应,但在上腹部或胸部手术后则不然。应用于手术部位的局部麻醉剂、肋间神经阻滞以及胸膜内和腹膜内给药也不会改变应激反应。术后通过使用局部麻醉剂和麻醉药进行充分的镇痛通常会导致心血管功能改善、肺部发病率和死亡率降低、更早下床活动以及深静脉血栓形成的可能性降低。一些数据表明,充分镇痛可改善患者的预后。局部麻醉剂阻断传入和传出神经通路似乎是减轻对疼痛和损伤的生理反应最有效的镇痛方式。