Suppr超能文献

持续性非卧床腹膜透析临床评估中透析充分性与代谢因素的关系

Dialysis adequacy versus metabolic factors in the clinical assessment of CAPD.

作者信息

Spinowitz B S, Gupta B K, Kulogowski J, Galler M, Golden R, Rascoff J, Charytan C

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, New York Hospital Medical Center of Queens, Flushing.

出版信息

Adv Perit Dial. 1993;9:295-8.

PMID:8105947
Abstract

We performed a cross sectional study of our continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients (n = 98) to examine the relation between parameters of adequacy of dialysis [KT/V, weekly creatinine clearance (Ccr)], urea kinetics (PCR), biochemical parameters (serum albumin), and clinical status of these patients. We also investigated the predictive value of these parameters in the determination of clinical outcomes. The clinical status of each patient was assessed by patient self-assessment and objectively by physicians and nurses. On this basis a total clinical assessment score was assigned. Individuals with a score of 3 or less were judged to be clinically stable (group 1, n = 61), while a score of 4 or more was considered "not doing well" (group 2, n = 37). A good correlation (r = 0.7) between subjective and objective assessments was observed. No correlation between total clinical assessment score and KT/V, PCRN (normalized protein catabolic rate), or Ccr was obtained, while serum albumin levels correlated inversely (r = -0.30; p < 0.003), suggesting that parameters of dialysis adequacy (weekly KT/V, Ccr) and urea kinetics (PCRN) are not predictive of clinical outcome in CAPD patients, in contrast with hemodialysis (HD) patients. Serum albumin levels were observed to be correlated with clinical outcome in CAPD patients. Hypoalbuminemia was observed in group 2 patients, despite statistically insignificant different values of KT/V, Ccr, and PCRN in the two groups. Therefore, clinical assessment and parameters such as serum albumin must be considered when determining the total well-being of CAPD patients.

摘要

我们对98例持续性非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)患者进行了一项横断面研究,以探讨透析充分性参数[KT/V、每周肌酐清除率(Ccr)]、尿素动力学(PCR)、生化参数(血清白蛋白)与这些患者临床状况之间的关系。我们还研究了这些参数在确定临床结局方面的预测价值。通过患者自我评估以及医生和护士的客观评估来评定每位患者的临床状况。在此基础上给出一个总的临床评估分数。分数为3分及以下的个体被判定为临床稳定(第1组,n = 61),而分数为4分及以上则被认为“情况不佳”(第2组,n = 37)。主观评估与客观评估之间呈现出良好的相关性(r = 0.7)。未发现总的临床评估分数与KT/V、标准化蛋白分解代谢率(PCRN)或Ccr之间存在相关性,而血清白蛋白水平呈负相关(r = -0.30;p < 0.003),这表明与血液透析(HD)患者不同,透析充分性参数(每周KT/V、Ccr)和尿素动力学(PCRN)并不能预测CAPD患者的临床结局。观察发现血清白蛋白水平与CAPD患者的临床结局相关。尽管两组患者的KT/V、Ccr和PCRN值在统计学上无显著差异,但在第2组患者中观察到了低白蛋白血症。因此,在确定CAPD患者的整体健康状况时,必须考虑临床评估和血清白蛋白等参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验