• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由未经实验室培训的人员进行的即时血气和电解质分析结果准确。

Near-patient blood gas and electrolyte analyses are accurate when performed by non-laboratory-trained individuals.

作者信息

Zaloga G P, Dudas L, Roberts P, Bortenschlager L, Black K, Prielipp R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 25157-1009.

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1993 Nov;9(5):341-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01618676.

DOI:10.1007/BF01618676
PMID:8106888
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of a near-patient blood gas and electrolyte analyzer when used by non-laboratory-trained clinicians in the critical care setting.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-five blood samples (split samples) from 50 intensive care unit patients were analyzed by clinicians in the critical care environment using a near-patient blood gas and electrolyte analyzer (GEM Premier, Mallinckrodt Sensor Systems, Ann Arbor, MI). Near-patient measurements were compared with those obtained by laboratory technologists in an established intensive care unit laboratory.

RESULTS

There was good agreement between the near-patient analyzer and the laboratory for pH, PCO2, sodium, potassium, ionized calcium, and hematocrit. Bias and precision were 0.006 and 0.03 for pH, 0.03 and 0.34 kPa for PCO2, 0.78 and 2.61 mmol/L for sodium, -0.11 and 0.12 mmol/L for potassium, -0.007 and 0.05 mmol/L for ionized calcium, and -0.99 and 1.33% for hematocrit. Bias between the laboratory instrument and the bedside analyzer was small for PO2 (-0.56 kPa). However, precision between instruments was significantly higher (2.39 kPa for all PO2 values and 1.61 kPa for PO2 < or = 13 kPa).

CONCLUSIONS

The test instrument is accurate and reproducible when used in the clinical setting by non-laboratory-trained individuals. Non-laboratory-trained individuals can obtain laboratory results in the near-patient setting comparable to those obtained by trained laboratory technologists.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定在重症监护环境中,未经实验室培训的临床医生使用床边血气和电解质分析仪时的准确性。

方法

50名重症监护病房患者的185份血样(分样)由重症监护环境中的临床医生使用床边血气和电解质分析仪(GEM Premier,马林克罗德特传感系统公司,密歇根州安阿伯)进行分析。将床边测量结果与在一家成熟的重症监护病房实验室中由实验室技术人员获得的结果进行比较。

结果

床边分析仪与实验室在pH值、二氧化碳分压、钠、钾、离子钙和血细胞比容方面具有良好的一致性。pH值的偏差和精密度分别为0.006和0.03,二氧化碳分压为0.03和0.34 kPa,钠为0.78和2.61 mmol/L,钾为 -0.11和0.12 mmol/L,离子钙为 -0.007和0.05 mmol/L,血细胞比容为 -0.99和1.33%。实验室仪器与床边分析仪之间的氧分压偏差较小(-0.56 kPa)。然而,仪器之间的精密度显著更高(所有氧分压值为2.39 kPa,氧分压≤13 kPa时为1.61 kPa)。

结论

该测试仪器由未经实验室培训的人员在临床环境中使用时准确且可重复。未经实验室培训的人员在床边环境中可获得与经过培训的实验室技术人员相当的实验室结果。

相似文献

1
Near-patient blood gas and electrolyte analyses are accurate when performed by non-laboratory-trained individuals.由未经实验室培训的人员进行的即时血气和电解质分析结果准确。
J Clin Monit. 1993 Nov;9(5):341-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01618676.
2
Hand-held blood gas analyzer is accurate in the critical care setting.手持式血气分析仪在重症监护环境中具有准确性。
Crit Care Med. 1996 Jun;24(6):957-62. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199606000-00014.
3
Portable blood gas and electrolyte analyzer evaluated in a multiinstitutional study.便携式血气和电解质分析仪在一项多机构研究中进行评估。
Clin Chem. 1999 Jan;45(1):111-7.
4
Performance of Gem Premier blood gas/electrolyte analyzer evaluated.对Gem Premier血气/电解质分析仪的性能进行评估。
Clin Chem. 1993 Sep;39(9):1890-3.
5
Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer.Gem-Premier和ABL-70血气及电解质检测结果与传统实验室分析仪的比较。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003 Mar;35(1):24-7.
6
Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass.体外循环期间即时检测血细胞比容、血气、电解质、乳酸和葡萄糖的可靠性。
Perfusion. 2006 Jan;21(1):33-7. doi: 10.1191/0267659106pf846oa.
7
Evaluation of a hand-held blood gas analyzer for rapid determination of blood gases, electrolytes and metabolites in intensive care setting.评估一款手持式血气分析仪在重症监护环境中快速测定血气、电解质和代谢物的性能。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Apr;54(4):585-94. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0592.
8
Comparison of two portable clinical analyzers to one stationary analyzer for the determination of blood gas partial pressures and blood electrolyte concentrations in horses.比较两种便携式临床分析仪与一种固定式分析仪在马血液气体分压和血液电解质浓度测定中的应用。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 15;14(2):e0211104. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211104. eCollection 2019.
9
Comparison of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with two different blood gas analyzers and a core laboratory analyzer.使用两种不同的血气分析仪和一台核心实验室分析仪测量的血气、电解质和代谢物结果的比较。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Apr;75(2):97-105. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.981854. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
10
Clinical performance of a blood gas monitor: a prospective, multicenter trial.一款血气监测仪的临床性能:一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Crit Care Med. 1993 Apr;21(4):487-94. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199304000-00005.

本文引用的文献

1
Monitoring versus testing technologies: present and future.监测与检测技术:现状与未来。
MLO Med Lab Obs. 1991;23(9S Spec No):20-5, 28-31.
2
Statistics and ethics in medical research. VI--Presentation of results.医学研究中的统计学与伦理学。VI——结果呈现
Br Med J. 1980 Dec 6;281(6254):1542-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.281.6254.1542.
3
Blood gas quality control materials compared to tonometered blood in examining for interinstrument bias in PO2.在检测PO2的仪器间偏差时,将血气质量控制材料与用血气分析仪校准过的血液进行比较。
Chest. 1988 Jul;94(1):49-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.1.49.
4
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.评估两种临床测量方法之间一致性的统计方法。
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
5
Bedside blood gas and electrolyte monitoring in critically ill patients.危重症患者的床边血气及电解质监测
Crit Care Med. 1989 Sep;17(9):920-5. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198909000-00017.
6
Bedside diagnostic blood testing. Its accuracy, rapidity, and utility in blood conservation.床边诊断性血液检测。其在血液保护方面的准确性、快速性及实用性。
JAMA. 1991 Jul 17;266(3):382-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.266.3.382.