Hawkins D F
Department of African American Studies and Sociology, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1993 Winter;12(4):80-95. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.12.4.80.
Policymakers often are at odds over what strategies will be most effective at reducing the incidence of violent behavior in high-risk populations. Beginning with the position that social theory and public policy are inextricably linked, the author examines the policy implications of the long-standing debate in the social sciences over the relative contributions of socioeconomic inequality versus cultural differences as causes of violence. While the weight of the scholarly evidence favors neither of these explanations, existing and proposed policies often reflect a preference for the importance of culture. This paper discusses the limitations of that choice and advocates alternative policies that consider the importance of both sets of etiological factors.
政策制定者们常常在何种策略能最有效地降低高危人群暴力行为发生率的问题上存在分歧。从社会理论与公共政策紧密相连这一立场出发,作者审视了社会科学领域长期存在的关于社会经济不平等与文化差异作为暴力成因的相对贡献的争论所带来的政策影响。虽然学术证据的权重并不偏向这两种解释中的任何一种,但现有的和提议的政策往往反映出对文化重要性的偏好。本文讨论了这种选择的局限性,并倡导考虑这两组病因因素重要性的替代政策。