Montesanti Stephanie Rose, Thurston Wilfreda E
School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
BMC Womens Health. 2015 Nov 11;15:100. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0256-4.
Research on interpersonal violence towards women has commonly focused on individual or proximate-level determinants associated with violent acts ignores the roles of larger structural systems that shape interpersonal violence. Though this research has contributed to an understanding of the prevalence and consequences of violence towards women, it ignores how patterns of violence are connected to social systems and social institutions.
In this paper, we discuss the findings from a scoping review that examined: 1) how structural and symbolic violence contributes to interpersonal violence against women; and 2) the relationships between the social determinants of health and interpersonal violence against women. We used concept mapping to identify what was reported on the relationships among individual-level characteristics and population-level influence on gender-based violence against women and the consequences for women's health. Institutional ethics review was not required for this scoping review since there was no involvement or contact with human subjects.
The different forms of violence-symbolic, structural and interpersonal-are not mutually exclusive, rather they relate to one another as they manifest in the lives of women. Structural violence is marked by deeply unequal access to the determinants of health (e.g., housing, good quality health care, and unemployment), which then create conditions where interpersonal violence can happen and which shape gendered forms of violence for women in vulnerable social positions. Our web of causation illustrates how structural factors can have negative impacts on the social determinants of health and increases the risk for interpersonal violence among women.
Public health policy responses to violence against women should move beyond individual-level approaches to violence, to consider how structural and interpersonal level violence and power relations shape the 'lived experiences' of violence for women.
针对女性的人际暴力研究通常聚焦于与暴力行为相关的个体或直接层面的决定因素,而忽略了塑造人际暴力的更大结构系统的作用。尽管这项研究有助于理解针对女性暴力的流行程度和后果,但它忽略了暴力模式与社会系统和社会机构的联系。
在本文中,我们讨论了一项范围综述的结果,该综述考察了:1)结构性和象征性暴力如何导致针对女性的人际暴力;2)健康的社会决定因素与针对女性的人际暴力之间的关系。我们使用概念图来确定关于个体层面特征与基于性别的针对女性暴力的人群层面影响以及对女性健康后果之间关系的报道内容。由于没有涉及或接触人类受试者,所以这项范围综述无需机构伦理审查。
不同形式的暴力——象征性、结构性和人际性——并非相互排斥,而是在女性生活中显现时相互关联。结构性暴力的特征是在获取健康决定因素(如住房、优质医疗保健和失业)方面存在严重不平等,这进而创造了人际暴力可能发生的条件,并塑造了处于弱势社会地位女性的性别化暴力形式。我们的因果关系网络说明了结构因素如何对健康的社会决定因素产生负面影响,并增加女性人际暴力的风险。
公共卫生应对针对女性暴力的政策应超越针对暴力的个体层面方法,转而考虑结构性和人际层面的暴力以及权力关系如何塑造女性暴力的“生活经历”。